Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dhs12345

My Dad in retirement was restoring covered bridges in NH and Vermont. I was driving with him circa 1992 to the different bridges and he was using a handheld Garmin to map their positions. He cursed SA for its making the positions less accurate. A large percentage of new civilian receivers use all four worldwide GNSS systems (Japan and India have regional systems). If SA was turned on for GPS, they can rely on the other three systems. So yes, SA is useless today.


13 posted on 01/05/2019 8:51:49 AM PST by Richard from IL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Richard from IL

That’s good to know.


14 posted on 01/05/2019 9:03:51 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Richard from IL

I always wondered how effective SA was. With it enabled, there was still decent accuracy. Maybe 50ft. Certainly accurate enough for a missile targeting system. So maybe the conclusion from the government was why bother. However I do believe that there is more to SA - a simple encryption algorithm could disable the system completely.

Also, where are the other satellites positioned? Satellite positioning is important. Also, the number if satellites affects accuracy.


18 posted on 01/05/2019 10:02:47 AM PST by dhs12345
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson