Q Anon: 01/10/19 Trust Trump's Plan

qmap.pub ^ | 01/10/19 | FReepers, vanity

[ransomnote]

[ransomnote]

Title: Talks to End U.S.-China Trade War Now Shift to Make-or-Break Rounds

Subtitle under photo: Trade negotiators, including Ted McKinney, the undersecretary for trade and foreign agricultural affairs, right, in Beijing on Tuesday.

By Keith Bradsher
Jan. 9, 2019

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/09/business/us-china-trade-talks-beijing.html

“In a statement after the talks ended, the United States trade representative’s office said the two sides had discussed China’s pledge to buy a “substantial” amount of American agricultural, energy and manufacturing products.

Negotiators also focused on White House concerns about China’s approach to intellectual property protection and its practice of so-called forced technology transfer, the statement said.”

[ransomnote]

https://news.yahoo.com/mnuchin-says-china-u-planning-190926942.html

December 18, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said he would probably meet with the Chinese in January.

“The two sides are planning to meet in January, according to Chinese officials with knowledge of the discussions who asked not to be named as the talks were private. China’s Ministry of Commerce didn’t respond to a faxed request for comment.”

[ransomnote]

PS: In the Forbidden City, the location of the photo in Q drop #2669 is believed to be Shanghai Pudong Airport.

[ransomnote]

More people in China. An FC resident says that the purpose of the visit was the trade war and "impropriety with Iran". ~~~~~~

[bagster]

Which one, ya think?

Mnuchin "sometime in January" and your first post talks about talks on Tuesday that already took place.

I don't think its that one. Q says "awaiting VIP arrival".

Also "senior US official" seems to refer to Mnuchin more than the others.

Or somebody else?

Bagster

[bagster]

Oh, boy. More chocies. Hahaha.

Bagster

[bagster]

Q posted his biggo RBG post from January 6, then this;

At what point is it mathematically impossible?
The very next day.
Red Castle.
Green Castle.
Public access to intel?
Q

He refers to the stories that came out about RBG the day after his post on the 6th as being a Q proof.

Then goes right into language about the military/national emergency building the wall.

Is he comparing the two separate events in the same way? We know Q predicted the military security long ago and moreso recently.

Or are the two events related somehow. When the biddy croaks, there will be one less derp vote on the SC, we do know that. Is Trump waiting for that? Is that the connection he's pointing us to?

What does he mean by "public access to intel"?

What intel?

Bagster

[ransomnote]

Is Mnuchin the most senior? Others sound like “officials” but Holdin’ out for senior. I think if I go back to FC, they’ll have dug up more choices. :/

[bagster]

The Oracle awaits input.

Goodnight, all.

p.s. Just had athought.

Is Q in China awaiting a VIP? Is that why the odd hour postings?

#ScrewinWithMySchedule

#OnChinamanTime

#ThanksQ

Bagster

[bagster]

I thought the vanity was a pretty good analysis of lefty thinking/plans.

Right?

All that "civil war" talk all day every day on other threads, but all of a sudden....

Frikken amazing.

Bagster

[JockoManning]

Just had an odd strong impression go through me ... not sure if triggered by the Q drops or the China pic or what ... the odd tweak was that somehow--no idea how--you, Dear Heart, whether you know it or not--have some sort of clue within you; within your awareness; within your conjectures--something--about the Q drops, RBG, China--something. You have some clue, key, insight that no one else has that could be substantial.

Maybe I'm just being off the wall. Maybe not. But you might ponder the above and see what surfaces. In any case, be bold, please, if so.

[ransomnote]

So the Anons are still trolling Acosta re his stupid "this place looks safe" stunt today, only they put him in China:

[piasa]

Ah, if only we could get him to stand in the Korean DMZ.

[ransomnote]

[ransomnote]

Perhaps purpose of official visit to china:

https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/US-Israel-air-concerns-over-China-telecom-companies-US-official-576929

 

U.S., ISRAEL AIR CONCERNS OVER CHINA TELECOM COMPANIES: U.S. OFFICIAL

"We are all concerned about theft of intellectual property and Chinese telecoms companies that are being used by China for intelligence-gathering purposes," said a senior administration official.

BY REUTERS

 JANUARY 10, 2019 08:11

 

[ransomnote]

2671

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI11 Jan 2019 - 2:15:03 AM

If a woman is selected as the nominee does that eliminate the wrap up smear re: sexual assault?
What other tactics might be planned to block and/or force name removal?
Why is the Senate important?
Who controls the Senate?
53-47
Enjoy the show.
Q

[bagster]

GraceG dropped a few Acosta burn memes. They are hilarious.

Please consider reading them with your special dragon magic, dear heart.

😉

GraceG Mocks Acosta Most Splendidly.

p.s. That's a good batch, Grace.

😃

Bagster

[ransomnote]

You’d think the Chinese would still be concerned about that well connected executive arrested.

How Huawei’s CFO ended up in a Canadian jail cell

By Julia Horowitz, CNN Business

Updated 12:13 PM ET, Tue December 11, 2018

https://www.cnn.com/2018/12/11/business/huawei-cfo-arrest-details/index.html

“Meng, the daughter of Huawei’s founder, was taken into custody on December 1 — the same day that President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping dined on steak in Buenos Aires and agreed to a truce in their trade war.”

[bagster]

What other tactics?

There's always old reliable, Roe v.Wade.

Is Q signaling that dead RBG's replacement will be that female that has been talked about? What's her name again?

Surely she has SOME dirt the derps can dig up on her to try to kill her nomination.

This one is gonna negate the Roberts factor.

Laws yes.

Bagster