[Tell It Right]

I'm always skeptical of sexual assault allegations made decades after the fact. Especially now that Singer has money to exploit.

The fact that Singer is a sorry good-for-nuthin liberal doesn't change that.

[Old Teufel Hunden]

"I'm always skeptical of sexual assault allegations made decades after the fact."

Especially when it involves kids I can understand how it can be decades later. Think of all of the kids that were molested by priests over the years. They didn't come out with the story right away. Having said that, I agree that we should all be skeptical and realize that people are innocent until proven guilty. However, there seems to be a lot of boys coming out with stories against him. One or two, color me skeptical. When it's this many boys accusing him of sexual harassment and rape, well he may be innocent in a court of law but in the court of public opinion he's looking awful guilty.

[Rastus]

Skepticism is fine. The fact that this guy openly admits to foam parties with young “men” and has had these kinds of stories follow him his entire career should at least put him under suspicion. Never leave your male children under his supervision.

[YogicCowboy]

It does not satisfy level of courtroom legal proof, no, but you are ignoring both historical and cultural context.

They did not have enough “proof” on Al Capone for running booze either - and partly because the cops protected him.