[JoSixChip]

Right, she signed a warrant authorizing surveillance on a presidential campaign without reading it. Complete BS! She read it and wanted get Trump, just like the rest of them. But ether way, criminal incompetence requires prosecution the same way criminal corruption does.

[Tallguy]

Right. In this situation which would you rather — admit to a potential corruption felony, or merely incompetence? She’s clearly opted for the latter.

[FreeReign]

Right, she signed a warrant authorizing surveillance on a presidential campaign without reading it. Complete BS! She read it and wanted get Trump,

Yup.

[vpintheak]

Correct.

[aspasia]

criminal incompetence requires prosecution the same way criminal corruption does.

She gave her honest confession under pretext of ignorance.

[EMI_Guy]

Right, she signed a warrant authorizing surveillance on a presidential campaign without reading it. Complete BS! She read it and wanted get Trump, just like the rest of them. But other way, criminal incompetence requires prosecution the same way criminal corruption does.

You're spot on and nicely stated.

[thoughtomator]

Yeah I don’t believe she didn’t read it for a second. That had to be the most interesting document to cross her desk in a long long time, and government workers do nothing but cover their own behinds. The statement that she signed off on something of this magnitude without understanding what it was is ludicrous and perjurious.