I started reading her doctoral dissertation for Oxford and it was puerile — it reads like an editorial rather than scholarship. In the first 4 paragraphs she used the word “arguably” 3 times and threw in the word “interestingly” (”I do not think that word means what you think it means” — Princess Bride).
The way this piece reads, she must be the head of some agency. How could anyone work with that privileged retard as a boss.
Hers? Or the one she submitted? (If the rumors are true).
So, if it was puerile, was it because the Clintons couldn't find somebody capable that would work for peanuts, or because if it was a worthy paper, no one reading it and had met Chelsea would believe she could actually write it?