Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

End of the superjumbo: Airbus is giving up on the A380
cnn ^ | 12:48 AM ET, Thu February 14, 2019 | Jethro Mullen,

Posted on 02/13/2019 10:23:11 PM PST by BenLurkin

The European plane maker said Thursday that it will stop delivering A380s in 2021 after Dubai-based airline Emirates slashed its orders for the huge jetliner.

The A380, the world's largest airliner, first took to the skies 14 years ago. But Airbus' giant bet that airlines would need lots of extra-big planes to fly passengers between major airport hubs didn't pay off as the company had hoped.

The company has delivered 234 of the superjumbos to date, less than a quarter of the 1,200 it predicted it would sell when it first introduced the double-decker aircraft.

(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

1 posted on 02/13/2019 10:23:11 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Didn’t outlive the 747 by very long. But even though they won’t make any more, I’m glad the A380 will still be in service for many years to come. Fine plane - upstairs in business class, when I have the chance to fly business, very quiet, clean and up-to-date.


2 posted on 02/13/2019 10:29:46 PM PST by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

They don’t have to make a profit, because they can go to the taxpayers of Europe. That’s why they can engage in projects like the A380, which was really a stunt for bragging rights (worlds biggest airplane made by the EU, not the USA) to deliver incredibly large air castles to middle eastern sheikhs at subsidized prices.

I don’t know how long the major airports of the world will continue to maintain the special gate apparatus and setups they needed to build in order to accommodate the A380’s double-deck passenger boarding and deplaining setup. Probably not too long.

Meantime, the Dreamliner is racking up enormous fuel savings for its owners.


3 posted on 02/13/2019 10:32:27 PM PST by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

The 747 is still alive in the lucrative cargo-hauling market


4 posted on 02/13/2019 10:32:47 PM PST by Starcitizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Boeing is still building the 747-8.


5 posted on 02/13/2019 11:12:01 PM PST by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Gone but not forgiven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom
"...They don’t have to make a profit, because they can go to the taxpayers of Europe. That’s why they can engage in projects like the A380, which was really a stunt for bragging rights...."

Well said.

It's about time the EU taxpayers quit subsidizing Emirates, which is far & away the largest benefactor of this castle in the sky. The heathen from the UAE are wealthy enough courtesy of the Western appetite for energy; they don't need or deserve this subsidy.

6 posted on 02/13/2019 11:12:43 PM PST by Sa-teef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I had mixed feelings when it was introduced - several market “brains” said there just wasn’t the demand for the massive planes - especially with the requirements that many airports upgrade terminals to accommodate the monsters. Also - it was introduced at a time that most carriers were actually DOWNsizing there aircraft - with a shift more toward regional jets. At the same time, Boeing was rolling out their latest - smaller than the A380, but also significantly more efficient.

I hadn’t keep up much after the initial deliveries - but I traveled to Europe last Spring - and saw a surprising number of the A380 aircraft under a few different colors - at Charles de Gaulle Airport - and at Atlanta.

I still want to fly on one...


7 posted on 02/13/2019 11:22:22 PM PST by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starcitizen

Its still alive with several carriers as well - it’s not been totally relegated to cargo use (though it is pretty good at it).


8 posted on 02/13/2019 11:23:15 PM PST by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Emirates isn’t the only carrier operating them -

Singapore Airlines
Emirates - I have seen
Qantas - I have seen
Air France - I have seen
Lufthansa - I have seen
Korean Air
China Southern Airlines
Malaysia Airlines
Thai Airways International (THAI)
British Airways - I have seen
Asiana Airlines
Qatar Airways - I have seen
Etihad Airways
Hi Fly


9 posted on 02/13/2019 11:27:07 PM PST by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists - redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Honest, I thought it was absurd at the time and would not be a profitable venture.

Oh well.


10 posted on 02/13/2019 11:35:57 PM PST by dp0622 (The Left should know if.. Trump is kicked out of office, it is WAR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I’ve only flown on one of these once. My first impression is that it is a pain getting that many passengers on and off the plane. Takes forever. My second impression is that it did not have enough bathrooms for the number of passengers it carried.


11 posted on 02/13/2019 11:56:06 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The closest I’ve been to one is driving south on 280 near SFO. Watching those beasts fly right over you is incredible. They seem to be floating, struggling to gain altitude, but it’s just an optical illusion. I think.


12 posted on 02/14/2019 12:04:05 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman


I still want to fly on one...

me too, right after I book passage in a cattle hauler from yuma to el paso.


13 posted on 02/14/2019 12:04:09 AM PST by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sa-teef

But Emirates has some of the best looking flight attendants around. Have to retire at 40. And they’ll let them know and let them go, if the red skirts start getting a little too tight. Between them Singapore, KLM, and maybe a handful of other state owned airlines, some of their flight attendants are like super models.

And the service in Economy Class is probably better than some Domestics in First Class.


14 posted on 02/14/2019 12:04:59 AM PST by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: qaz123


But Emirates has some of the best looking flight attendants around. Have to retire at 40. And they’ll let them know and let them go, if the red skirts start getting a little too tight.

like you've got a chance.


15 posted on 02/14/2019 12:10:26 AM PST by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Just as well, they’ll all be gone in 10 years anyway. It’ll take a lot longer going by train to Asia, though.


16 posted on 02/14/2019 12:23:17 AM PST by zipper (In their heart of hearts, every Democrat is a communist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek


Didn’t outlive the 747 by very long.

what a pantload.

747 made: 1548
380 made: 234

747 produced: 1968-present
388 produced: 2005-2019


17 posted on 02/14/2019 12:24:42 AM PST by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

I read a couple of years ago that the ‘380 needed to fly near-capacity if it was to make money — many times it didn’t. Four engines ate up fuel and all the other costs associated with the bigger size were just too much. Boeing’s 777 was a better investment for the airlines.


18 posted on 02/14/2019 12:37:03 AM PST by Loud Mime (Liberalism: intolerance masquerading as tolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Loud Mime


I read a couple of years ago that the ‘380 needed to fly near-capacity if it was to make money — many times it didn’t.

the EU is desperate for money, what with all the new immogrent dependents they've adopted.       so if the 380 was makin' money, they sure as heck wouldn't ditch it!


19 posted on 02/14/2019 12:43:27 AM PST by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AnotherUnixGeek

Didn’t outlive the 747 at all. Boeing is still building cargo versions of the 747, and 2 new presidential aircraft, whose delivery date is 2024.

CC


20 posted on 02/14/2019 1:13:36 AM PST by Celtic Conservative (My cats are more amusing than 200 channels worth of TV.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson