Posted on 02/21/2019 10:52:22 AM PST by Lean-Right
I think This means that these 2nd amendment Sanctuary counties won’t be sued...unless they want to see corresponding “sanctuary counties” (illegals) sued also. We tried to make it happen in our county...couldnt, but other Oregon counties have succeeded.
Somwhat does that mean?
Sanctuaries FOR the Second Amendment or FROM it?
Thank you.
Man, I hear you but I still hold out hope that Trump, alleged to be a student of Sun Tzu, is STILL gathering intel and preparing the battlefield.
Back in October, 2016 I caught a letter on the net written to Comey by retired career FBI Agent Hugh W. Galyean concerning Comey’s failure to refer Clinton for prosecution. I found a California phone number for Hugh on the web, called it, got an answering recording and left a voice mail to that effect. Around 11pm, my phone rang. It was Hugh. We chatted for about 5 minutes, during which he confirmed that ALL of the FBI line agents he knew (and Hugh knows many) were FURIOUS that Clinton was given a pass and that, with some luck, this was FAR from over and if the election went right, those responsible would PAY! What’s going on NOW is a serious effort by the criminals at the very top to save their sorry asses.
I’m with you, brother. I’m also a retired Army intelligence (counterterrorism)officer and student of Sun Tzu. After I retired in 1995, I worked for the Bureau for seven years, did a 15-month detail in the White House after 9/11 and retired from DOJ in 2007.
I know a lot of these guys in the news; hell, I sat right next to Mueller in a number of senior WH staff and NSC staff meetings. Mike Flynn was a student of mine and I’ve known him for almost 25 years; he’s one of the four or five best officers I knew and his life’s been ruined, which pisses me off more than you can possibly imagine. I can’t talk about Brennan or Clapper, both of whom I knew, and I can’t talk about either one of them without cutting loose with a string of profanity. As I told one person not long ago, “I wouldn’t piss on either one of them if he were on fire!”
I know a lot of FBI agents and still communicate with the very best of them. The Bureau’s culture is seriously screwed up; it would be better written as “cult-sure”. One does not buck the Bureau way without getting OPR’d by some asshole at HQ. The things that get an agent into trouble more quickly than anything are guns, weapons and cars. A sniper killing an innocent woman (Lon Horiuchi at Ruby Ridge) is an unfortunate accident that would get a military sniper court-martialed.
All that being said, there are some good folks in the Bureau. I just wish more of them would come forward; there’s plenty to talk about.
Cheers!
I’ve left a few used cervesas in the waters of the Rio Grande
Sanctuary from newly passed bills
for background checks on private sales,
and gun confiscation from those deemed
to be a danger to themselves, or others.
The Sheriff departments have claimed
the bills are unenforceable.
The state can’t mandate the federal
government to do these background checks.
An example from San Juan county in the
link.
I can see 3 counties that would
pass no such sanctuary laws.
Bernalillo, Sandoval, and Santa Fe.
About 350 people showed up today to
voice their concerns.
Sad to say it’s true. The district
I live in has bee republican for the
passed 86 years. 3500 suddenly found
votes turned it blue.
My apologies,
https://www.conservativereview.com/news/new-mexico-counties-fighting-gun-grabbers-second-amendment-sanctuaries/
Sad, but Bernalillo county should
be the least restrictive. Very high
crime rate.
Met a friend at the hearing who owns
a dairy farm just outside Roswell.
He moved his dairy business here from
California. Diehard conservative.
The state was regulating him to death.
You’re correct. This action by Sheriff
departments is to head off current bills
being considered. All existing laws are
still enforced.
This action by Sheriff
departments is to head off current bills
being considered. All existing laws are
still enforced.
I see. It’s a weak resolution that doesn’t do anything. They just “affirm” their “support” for the sheriff “in the exercise of his sound discretion” and in decisions “not to enforce any unconstitutional firearms law,” and resolves not to appropriate funds “for the purpose of enforcing law that unconstitutionally infringes on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.”
In other words, the sheriff has their “support” in declining to enforce laws he determines to be unconstitutional, and they won’t appropriate money to enforce laws they think are unconstitutional, until they do.
The Tenth Amendment Center has been promoting a much stronger resolution: It explicitly declares that all federal laws regulating firearms and ammunition are unconstitutional and prohibits and county/city employees or officials from enforcing them.
Good analogy, and points taken.
The main reason the Sheriff’s
voiced concern is for the bill that
requires a background check on private
sales. This law (in New Mexico) is
unenforceable due to the fact that there
is no gun registry required. Where this
law would lead next is registration,
and eventually to confiscation.
The state can’t mandate the federal
government to do these background checks.
And thank you, sir, for your service! My dad served 26 years in the Air Force and retired as a CMSgt. He was stationed at Ubon, Thailand, in ‘68/’69 with the 25th TFS. Chappie James was his squadron commander and Robin Olds his wing commander (555th TFW).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.