Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The first look at how hacked self-driving cars would affect New York City traffic
TechExplore.com ^ | March 4, 2019 | American Physical Society

Posted on 03/04/2019 11:21:12 AM PST by ETL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: marktwain

Not what I understand from attending a presentation by someone who’s involved. It’s one thing operating a single autonomous vehicle, but operating a whole fleet in the same area apparently requires huge bandwidth and the U.S. is not up to it technologically.

China is, unfortunately, and they are taking the lead in this area—the speaker said they have been advocating that the U.S. get a move on so it doesn’t permanently lose the lead to China.


21 posted on 03/04/2019 12:24:40 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

Well, that specifically, can’t happen. The traffic lights have what is called a “Malfunction Management Unit” - which is hard wired to look for “incompatible” light combinations, such as all being green.


22 posted on 03/04/2019 12:25:50 PM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

https://jhalderm.com/pub/papers/traffic-woot14.pdf

Intentional tripping of the MMU can often result (depending on manufacture/configuration) flashing yellow. All flashing yellows would be just as bad.


23 posted on 03/04/2019 12:35:51 PM PST by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

I thought I only imagined that movie.

Never saw it but the trailer creeped me out as a little kid.


24 posted on 03/04/2019 12:41:35 PM PST by wally_bert (You're bringing The Monk down, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ETL

They need to be hack proof.


25 posted on 03/04/2019 12:46:10 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve_Seattle
My opinion is that self-driving cars will become mandatory, and they will be so expensive that the average person won’t be able to afford them. I see this is one more ruse to take cars away from people.

It is not hard to keep a car going for 20+ years, so the many of cars sold today, and three or four years from now will be on the road in the 2040s with human drivers.

Rather than outlaw the cars outright, they will simply do like they did with horses, mark special newly designed roads as driverless only. Force drivers on side-streets etc. and achieve incremental, but continual change that way without getting sued for loss of use of the car.
26 posted on 03/04/2019 12:50:21 PM PST by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: All

I work in this area of tech.

While the argument of hacking an autonomous vehicle is a concern I’d like to point out that with modern connected vehicles it doesn’t have to be autonomous. Many of the systems in a car are now electrified, including steering, throttle, brakes - all on some sort of network. With the right hack I might be able to set off all the airbags in all Ford Mustangs and go wide-open-throttle at the same time.

Good architecture can attempt to limit the dangers with layers of security, e.g. separate networks and gateways for different things. That said, vehicle cyber security is a real problem, the amount of money that goes into it has to compete against money going toward new features customers are demanding. How many have “cyber security” at the top of their next vehicle check list? ...so you can guess the level of priority it gets.

Ask yourself - how many different vendors provide software that goes into any given vehicle model? The OEM won’t be able to answer that question. How much of the software was written (and reused since) before vehicles were getting connected? Again, good luck getting answers. We have things like “secure boot” (tamper detect) of compute devices but there’s no “secure chain of trust” established between all the various vendors providing software (that is then integrated into a system).

As for those pointing out the challenges with autonomous driving against “nuanced” use-cases, this is the difference between the autonomy levels - Level 1 (basic driving assistance) through Level 5 (can handle all situations). I don’t know anybody believing in L5 anytime soon but L4 is already happening, things are out of research and are now in active production initiatives. Level 3 is already in production (Audi A8, Tesla) - effectively “highway chauffeurs”. As the compute power becomes available they’ll just be able to handle more and more - but being able to tell the driver they’ll need to take over when necessary.

Personally I’d like to see the technology applied to making me a safer driver first, actively intervene if I’m going to hit stuff. Mitigating drunk and distracted drivers would cause death rates to plummet - but I still want to drive and I still want to be able to turn it all off if I chose to.


27 posted on 03/04/2019 12:51:57 PM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wally_bert

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fh84MPJ_YRY

IMHO, it’s actually a pretty neat little film.


28 posted on 03/04/2019 12:52:11 PM PST by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: redfreedom
This stuff is serious. Hacking a computer we lose information. Hacking vehicles we lose lives.

Bingo.

29 posted on 03/04/2019 12:53:26 PM PST by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: taxcontrol

I would argue that all-yellow isn’t just as bad...but in general I’d also argue that units that are susceptible to this are not doing their intended job.


30 posted on 03/04/2019 12:53:52 PM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
In NYC, the cab drivers will work to kibosh their use, so for that matter will mass transit demagogues. I think the tech that makes sense involves certain kinds of braking assists, such as those feel-good ads that have been on for a number of years already, where the kid in the crosswalk's life is saved by the robotic braking hooked to radar or whatever.

31 posted on 03/04/2019 12:55:12 PM PST by SunkenCiv (and btw -- https://www.gofundme.com/for-rotator-cuff-repair-surgery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: bgill

But democrats get more voters.


32 posted on 03/04/2019 12:59:34 PM PST by wally_bert (You're bringing The Monk down, man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Imagine the asymmetric warfare implications for hacked self driving vehicles.


33 posted on 03/04/2019 1:00:19 PM PST by radmanptn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The DARPA competitions that started the autonomous vehicle movement 20 years ago, insisted on no outside control.

It may be true that the systems will be able to function without outside control, but it will also be true that government regulations will require that the capability for outside control will be provided in those systems.

34 posted on 03/04/2019 1:04:59 PM PST by Fresh Wind (Trump: "America will never be a socialist country!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Can see the hacked cars going 80 miles a hour through school zones with sadistic midget minds whooping it up on the internet.


35 posted on 03/04/2019 1:05:12 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (Start using cash and checks or the elite class and bankers will make "cashless" the norm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

5G Tech is here already, just stick your head in the microwave oven.


36 posted on 03/04/2019 1:08:11 PM PST by TheNext (Participation Award Winner = CoC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

On a positive note 5G will take care of the rat problem in large cities, although probably it won’t affect the cockroaches.


37 posted on 03/04/2019 1:57:50 PM PST by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Great Scott!


38 posted on 03/04/2019 3:09:39 PM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
Related image
39 posted on 03/04/2019 3:14:45 PM PST by ETL (Obama-Hillary, REAL Russia collusion! Uranium-One Deal, Missile Defense, Iran Deal, Nukes: Click ETL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ETL

Haha, nice. :D


40 posted on 03/04/2019 4:41:43 PM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson