Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JPJones
Principia Scientific is NOT a credible source.

Says who? You?

I find the information in post number four to be very credible.

16 posted on 03/12/2019 9:33:49 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

I get all my science information from Bill Nye. He’s the best.


19 posted on 03/12/2019 9:40:36 PM PDT by Kozy (new age haruspex; "Everyone has a plan 'till they get punched in the mouth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: Windflier

Principia Scientific is NOT a credible source.

“Says who? You? “

Yup.

And Dr. Roy Spencer, noted climate skeptic.

The “Slayers” as they are known, are fringe. In their efforts to refute AGW, they deny that a GHE exists, and use ridiculous non-scientific, non-physics rationales.

They give AGW skeptics a bad name.

“I find the information in post number four to be very credible.”

The Ludecke paper looks credible, the others I’m not sure. If arguing with Warmists, use the authors, best not to mention Principia Scientifica. Unless you enjoy being ridiculed.


60 posted on 03/13/2019 5:02:28 AM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson