Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

The predominance of the invaders’ males lineages suggests that native males were killed off.


4 posted on 03/15/2019 2:27:50 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Rockingham
It could also indicate that they new coat of paint, as it were, was nearly completely male, or that they tended to have larger families, and/or lower infant mortality. They may just have been preferred as lovers, or had a little more, uh, gas in the tank as it were. For that matter, the preceding Beaker People men may have been polygamous, and not all that numerous.

6 posted on 03/15/2019 2:39:38 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (this tagline space is now available)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Rockingham
Yeah.

The invaders had horses and swords, the natives didn't.

They killed all the men and took the women.

8 posted on 03/15/2019 2:59:17 AM PDT by Eagles6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Rockingham; SunkenCiv

Exactly. And the “invasion from the (cold) eastern lands” just like the mongols later across Europe, and the huns, visigoths, vandals, etc after the Roman Warm Period.


9 posted on 03/15/2019 3:12:51 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (The democrats' national goal: One world social-communism under one world religion: Atheistic Islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson