IF REPUBLICANS LOSE IN 2020 AMERICA AS WE KNOW IT IS OVER, SAYS GLENN BECK

Newsweek ^ | 3/19/19 | EWAN PALMER

[50mm]

Okay. Dual major in Womyn's Studies and Gender Studies it is.

Angry NJ womyn.

Orange man bad.

Period.

[TBP]

There were other candidates.

By the binary logic that says “opposing Trump was in fact support for Hillary”, it logically follows that “opposing Hillary was in fact support for Trump,” does it not? (Of course it does; by the binary-choice logic, it has to be one or the other. Correct?

So:

If opposing Trump is in fact supporting Hillary, and
Opposing Hillary is in fact supporting Trump,

Then what is it if you opposed both of them? Support for both? (That would be the logical answer.)

Now, since that is a nonsensical, self-contradictory conclusion that is necessitated by the logic of your premise, then the premise must be in error.

[Kazan]

Anyone refusing to vote for Trump was helping Hillary Clinton.

There was no excuse for him not being behind Trump after the primary given that the fate of the Supreme Court was at stake.

[Lurker]

Supporting or opposing is very different from voting for one or the other. Stabby McCheeto made it quite clear who he was voting for. And it wasn’t President Trump.

A vote cast for any other candidate was actively assisting Hillary.

Beck can go screw himself.

L

[TBP]

The logic is the same.

If you consider not voting for Trump to be actively assisting Hillary, then logically you must consider not voting for Hillary to be actively assisting Trump.

If that’s true, then not voting for either actively assisted both.