Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: vannrox

I am 50 and this is the first time I read about a 3” floppy.


2 posted on 04/10/2019 7:22:06 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Actually, it was 3.5” floppy, a tremendoun improvement over the 5 1/4” floppy.

The Zip Drive followed, but read/write CDs killed it.


5 posted on 04/10/2019 7:31:34 AM PDT by Redleg Duke (We live on a tax farm as free-range humans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

I use my old 3.5” floppies for target practice.


22 posted on 04/10/2019 8:03:27 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The I recall the 3” disk format but there were other competing “mass” storage forms as well at the time including a mini-string tape transport, which used a small, short tape loop cartridge similar to 8 track (remember the trailing tapes going from the cartridge to the transport in your car when the tape got wrapped around the capstan?), a mini cassette system, all of which main claim was they were going to be less expensive to buy the external transport than the external floppy drive cost. All of them failed for the same reason, non-interchangeability with the main built-in 5 ¼” drive, not to mention poorly conceived designs and access speeds.


25 posted on 04/10/2019 8:06:07 AM PDT by Swordmaker (My pistol self-identifies as an iPad, so you must accept it in gun-free zones, you hoplaphobe bigot!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson