Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cdcdawg
Patton was engaging in all sorts of wrongthink. It was convenient for the powers that be that he died.

But not necessary to kill him. Nothing prevented Eisenhower or Truman from relieving him of his command. Truman fired MacArthur a few years later; firing Patton wouldn't have caused him any concerns. Especially if Eisenhower and Marshall were in support of it.

5 posted on 04/18/2019 6:44:46 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: DoodleDawg

Especially if Eisenhower and Marshall were in support of it. ........................ Omar and Monty too..... But there must be conspiracy to make it more exciting. Roosevelt, Wallace and Morgenthau had to placate Stalin, and remove any antagonist that would upset the power cart of the post war divided Europe. Ehhh.


8 posted on 04/18/2019 6:57:07 AM PDT by Bringbackthedraft (What is earned is treasured, what is free is worth what you paid for it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

My dad said Patton was right when he said we should re-arm the Germans and join them to push from the west into Russia while MacArthur pushed from the east...Patton and MacArthur would shake hands in Moscow...


9 posted on 04/18/2019 7:03:34 AM PDT by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg
Patton was rather unstoppable. He had already rearmed the Herman Goering Division. It seemed that he really could have "started a war with the Bolsheviks, and make them look like they started it". He could do just that in or out of uniform.

I think, in truth, that Patton knew where to draw the line. Perhaps those who ranked him did not know that for sure. He scared the crap out of them, making them desperate.

15 posted on 04/18/2019 7:15:09 AM PDT by GingisK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Having known several WW2 veterans with a belief that Patton was murdered, their explanation was that it was Patton’s viability as a politician at home that caused him to be targeted by the then Deep State.

As noted, his immediate military views were easy to neutralize without killing him.


32 posted on 04/18/2019 7:42:11 AM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

But not necessary to kill him. Nothing prevented Eisenhower or Truman from relieving him of his command.

Patton had stated that professionalism prevented him coming forward on some issues while still in uniform. He planned on exposing some after the war. Dismissal would have speeded this up.


42 posted on 04/18/2019 8:07:47 AM PDT by CrazyIvan (A gentleman arms himself for the protection of others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Postwar, Patton was possibly going to be nominated as US Army Ground Forces Commander. But as the US Army Air Force was about to be spun off as a separate service branch, the position was being done away with. I mention this as it would have been possible to “promote” Patton out of the limelight. Bury him in the Pentagon where reporters had less access to him. In short, it wasn’t necessary to murder him.


46 posted on 04/18/2019 8:14:01 AM PDT by Tallguy (Facts be d*mned! The narrative of the day must be preserved!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: DoodleDawg

Political establishment was terrified of MacArthur. I think there is a book called American Caesar that details it.

Very illuminating perspective. They were more afraid of Patton than they were of MacArthur.


79 posted on 04/18/2019 11:14:34 AM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson