Posted on 06/19/2019 7:39:40 AM PDT by EdnaMode
A startup focused on sexual wellness is suing the New York public transit system after its sex toy ad campaign was rejected. The company, Dame Labs, includes a pretty exhaustive list of other sexually-oriented advertisements that the MTA has run, including erectile dysfunction medication, condoms, women’s libido medication, dating apps, and the Museum of Sex.
“By banning Dame’s advertisements, the MTA is telling the women of New York City that it does not care about their sexual health, well-being, and pleasure,” according to the complaint, which was filed on Tuesday.
In the complaint, Dame states that the company submitted multiple ads to the MTA for consideration for an ad campaign in July of last year, and was subsequently strung along for several months, asked to tweak their ads to be less sexually suggestive, only to ultimately have their campaign rejected. Dame included images on its website of the final ads it sent to the MTA for approval—they feature the company’s vibrator and clitoral stimulation devices. And, as Dame pointed out in the complaint, they are hardly more overtly suggestive or sexual in nature than a number of ads that have and are adorning subway stations and cars.
The company is suing the transit system for violating the first amendment and fourteenth amendment (both for an unconstitutionally vague regulation and an equal protection violation), as well as for a violation of freedom of speech, according to the complaint.
“Advertisements are hugely influential on our culture,” Dame wrote in a blog announcing its lawsuit against the MTA, “and have the potential to bring sexual wellness tools out of the shadows and into our lives.”
The MTA is not the first, and probably won’t be the last, organization to seemingly view messages of sexual empowerment for women as somehow too scandalous to advertise. And by still allowing other sexually-oriented businesses, though ones that aren’t as explicit about catering to someone with a vulva, to market their products, it also perpetuates the ill-considered misconception that a woman getting off is a reality that should be publicly suppressed, rather than inclusively acknowledged. Or, even, tastefully celebrated in an ad campaign.
“The fact that companies advertising erectile dysfunction medications can advertise and yet we’ve been deemed too sexual points to a clear gender bias and censorship from the MTA, which we believe is part of a larger cultural inability to openly and safely discuss women’s sexuality,” Dame co-founder Alex Fine told W Magazine. “While we tried to work together with the MTA to make a change, our efforts ultimately proved futile. We’re doing this to take a stand not only for Dame Products, but for all other businesses aiming to reach vulva-owners that have been muted.”
This is the 21st. Century. Few vulvas are humble anymore.
"vulva-owners". Sheesh...
So what’s the deal here? They want to push the envelope, push it further and further? All to shock us, and move the goal posts as to what is acceptable?
Lot of people have felt into that trap.
Vulva owners? Geez Louise.
Are these the same people as “Vaginal Ameicans”, as we hyphenate everyone into what grievance group they belong to?
"They're Boxy. But Good."
“By banning Dame’s advertisements, the MTA is telling the women of New York City that it does not care about their sexual health, well-being, and pleasure,”
I despise the hyperbole of the Left. I’m so sure that is exactly what MTA is telling women...normal decency couldn’t possibly be a factor.
Peta pockets?
I owned a green Vulva that had 300k miles on it.
(Damn you auto correct!)
I’ve always wondered why statues from early times have male genitalia so perfectly sculpted but never a female’s. Interesting.
“.... owned a green Vulva ....”
So you dated “My favorite Martian’s” sister?
So are PENIS pictures OK?
I knew a guy who acquired a Vulva. It gave him nothing but trouble. He went in the hole on that deal.
Home to the delightful Delores?
Liberals need to get their brains out of their underpants
At my kids grade school in Oklahoma there was a 3foot tall picture of some kind of Orchid right out side of their cafeteria. To me it looked exactly (with a very little artistic license) like a vulva. Some unseen person was laughing their ass off.
Mulva?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.