What if Custer would have had close air support during the battle of the Little Big horn...???
He could have used a few of these.
Posted on 06/25/2019 7:36:18 AM PDT by Red Badger
From Saturday Night Live skit:
What if Napoleon had a fully loaded B-52 with nuclear weapons at the Battle of Waterloo?
What if Superman had landed in Germany during WWII
Both were classic skits
Uber-Man: I am... Uberman! I have superhuman powers, and I fight for untruth, injustice, and the Nazi way! And I have X-ray vision!
Lois Laneoff: X-ray vision? Can you see through my clothes? [covers herself]
Uber-Man: Ja. And through his, too. [points at Jimmy Olstein] He's a Jew!
Jimmy Olstein: No! No, it’s not true! My parents were just very advanced in hygeine, that’s all..!
Hitler: Silence! Guard, take this Jew away!
Uberman: No need! I’ll drop him off at the camp on my vay to the Eastern front!
What would you have done if your scouts had come in and reported “huge herds of horse”?
What would you have done if one of your chief Indian scouts reported, “I’ve been with these Indians for 30 years and this is the largest village I’ve ever seen.”?
Would you have at least taken a pause and eyeball’d the battle space?
If you were advancing on an enemy’s position and you started hearing a firefight to your flank and BEHIND you.
Wouldn’t you at least try to figure out what going on?
Because Custer didn’t do any of that.
Custer underestimated his enemy and overestimated his abilities. The Gods of War will punish you every time for that.
“There was a TV movie called The Trial Of General George Armstrong Custer.”
I remember that movie. There was also a book by the same name. Both were excellent.
I can’t remember the outcome of the trial but I think it was a hung jury. I wonder if the jury deadlocked because they saw that Custer was essentially mentally and career-wise washed up and decided not to punish him further.
I’d love to see that movie again.
LMFAO
What if Custer would have had close air support during the battle of the Little Big horn...???
He could have used a few of these.
Yes, but the Western Way of War STILL could have prevailed-—however, it takes concentrated fire and unlimited ammo.
This was the same, more or less, situation at Isandlwana, where the Brits overextended their lines and lacked ammo. But at Blood River, some 40 years earlier, Boers with far more primitive weapons, in a laager, defeated a higher ratio of Zulus.
Western firepower is absolutely unbeatable against more primitive foes IF it is concentrated.
“They were completely unsuited for the terrain.”
I visited that battlefield, and was amazed at the terrain. I had imagined mountains and deserts; it was rather gentle rolling prairie.
The wheeled guns were not nearly as heavy to haul as the ammunition boxes.
When confronted by firepower, you...
“Grab their belts to fight them.”
- General Giap PAVN
“I’ve never heard an explanation as to why Custer wasn’t issued repeating rifles.”
One of the problems was the repeaters used much lighter rounds than the 45-70 and were less effective at longer ranges.
The investigation after the battle led the Ordinance Dept to replace all copper jacketed 45-70 with brass jacket. The copper jacket had expanded in the rifle as heat increased to the point that the fired round could not be ejected. Brass expands less.
Well, yeah, but think of all the ammunition they would have wasted. /S
That’s right. It was an impossible situation.
Thanks for the good info.
brrrrrrrrrtttt.
- The sound of freedom raining down on you
I remember seeing that episode. Thanks.
Your analysis is spot on.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.