Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Leaning Right

Custer was quite a success in the Civil War, becoming the youngest general officer in US history. Unfortunately, being reduced to a mere Lieutenant Colonel (My rank at retirement), he refused to acknowledge the reduction, wore stars on his uniform, and was a driven, vainglorious individual...a disaster, waiting to happen.

Of course, I didn’t go to West Point.


112 posted on 06/25/2019 12:41:41 PM PDT by Redleg Duke (We live on a tax farm as free-range humans!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Redleg Duke

He actually was not reduced in rank. He never held a General’s Commission in the U.S. Army. During the Civil War He was a Brevet Brigadier General. This rank was temporary and held until the war ended. At the end of the war, his brevet commission expired. He was then appointed Lt Col. in the Regular Army. He was lucky, in that respect, the Union Army shrank from about 800,000 men in 1865 to a Regular Army of about 15,000 men in 1866.


124 posted on 06/25/2019 3:13:39 PM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Redleg Duke

He was not the youngest General in US History at that point.

That honor went to Ranald MacKenzie (USMA 1862) if you count West Point grads. And even then it was only a Brevet Rank.

Or you could say Galusha Pennypacker was the youngest. The reason nobody firmly says he’s the youngest is because there are discrepancies in his birth documents.


133 posted on 06/25/2019 3:25:20 PM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (Like Enoch, Noah, & Lot, the True Church will soon be removed & then destruction comes forth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson