Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Bonemaker

I would never have voted for Perot, as he was pro-abort, but I do not believe that he cost George the Elder the election.

Besides Perot, Pat Buchanan’s campaign where he scored 38% against an incumbent president should have been taken as a warning sign.

When Perot jumped in, many Establishment experts assumed he would take votes from Clinton because of his gas tax, pro-abort, and government interventionist stances. These experts read the public’s perception completely wrong. As a result, Bush the Elder pussy-footed around Perot until it was too late. He also made no effort to address the dissatisfaction of the base, relying on anti-Clinton sentiment to rally the troops. It wasn’t enough.

Bush lost the election. He wasn’t entitled to Perot votes.


30 posted on 07/09/2019 8:14:15 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("...a choice between Woke-fevered Democrats and Koch-funded Republicans is insufficient."-Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dr. Sivana

“I would never have voted for Perot, as he was pro-abort...”

So was Bush, he just didn’t have the guts to state it openly by the time he was running for president.


44 posted on 07/09/2019 9:00:20 AM PDT by Lurker51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson