Replies

If Q is an AI, then I’d bet that Q scrapes the internet/headlines to use in decision-making. And clearly Q posts a lot of links.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ah but AI didn’t recruit POTUS. And POTUS wouldn’t get along well with an AI, his unpredictable atypical nature would have an AI crying sitting in a corner. :)

Siri and Alexa still say ridiculous things or get in trouble because after listening to all our conversations, they still miss massive important content as they aren’t human and struggle to sort relevance. And they are stumbling just answering simple questions. The question “Alexa, do you work for the CIA” caused Alexa to fall silent and shut down a few times (avoiding answering?)

The Generals that POTUS brought into the Whitehouse, the grim faced warriors who lined up behind him at his inauguration - these aren’t the kind of people to turn the fate of the world over to an untested “innovative” AI.

I can believe Q is in close proximity to POTUS because that’s the most effective way they could coordinate. When POTUS had General Kelley as his chief of staff, it made sense to me that Kelley was laying down infrastructure for Plan Z so that if Plan Z should ever be necessary - it was ready to go without “transition time”.

I worked for someone on a simple AI. The data loading and testing were often derided as more trouble than the eventual system would ever be worth. Now try loading that system with an understanding of “evil” like the world has never seen and have it model a war “evil” would fight. I don’t believe that Q=AI would be feasible nor would it be palatable to warriors who would have to win the battle for the world on an untried system (this war has never been fought before) no human could reasonable be expected to understand it’s reasoning.

God wins.

Just my 2. :D

Perhaps we are using “AI” to describe vastly different things!

I am not using “AI” to describe some master intelligence that is ruling the world! I am using it to describe software that can be used for a specific purpose. It can be set in motion and let loose to do some specific thing. Kind of like a roomba for communication with us. Your roomba isn’t suddenly going to go crazy and destroy your house. It has a specific purpose and it has specific limits to what it can do. And if Q is AI, it isn’t suddenly going to go crazy and destroy the world.

I’m quite confident that if Q is AI, it’s a COMMS AI. It’s not a missile launch AI or anything crazy like that. It’s a very simple and very specifically tailored AI. Just like and AI chess program.

If you have a chess AI that can beat any human being, that doesn’t mean that it can rule the world. It probably can’t even play checkers! Because it hasn’t been programmed to do that.

Ah but AI didn’t recruit POTUS. And POTUS wouldn’t get along well with an AI, his unpredictable atypical nature would have an AI crying sitting in a corner. :)

Great post! Not just this line but every word you wrote. I've been struggling trying to come up with a coherent and non combative response to Generally's AI posts and hadn't hit the right note. The last thing I'd want is to start an argument or cut off a FreeQ whose opinions I generally (see what I did there?) find to be very well thought out and valuable

Your post is exactly what I wanted to say...so...Thank You!