Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

It is hostile architecture principles applied to furniture. It is still HOSTILE.

It is all made to literally hurt and constrain men and to force women into the form liberals are imposing on them. After all, the “women’s” chair doesn’t let them sit with their legs closed.

The only line of attack liberals will allow on this is “it doesn’t accommodate fat and disabled people”.


9 posted on 07/20/2019 10:13:19 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: tbw2

There is a short video at the link. The people look acutely uncomfortable.

This young women, who thinks she is an inventor, is very self absorbed, not too bright and quite hostile to both men & women. Forcing women’s legs apart & coercing men to sit as though they were gelded is desirable to her because that promotes her chosen stereotypes. Their discomfort is irrelevant as is her lack of the right to coerce them. A typical brain dead leftist.


58 posted on 07/20/2019 12:40:48 PM PDT by JayGalt (You can't teach a donkey how to tap dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson