or lorena fuddy ...
Posted on 08/01/2019 2:26:47 PM PDT by Rio
This was one office not a statement by the department of FBI or DOJ.
Good.
Do you really think Trump is on board with the FBI warning that conspiracy theorists are terrorists?
************
I’d love to see the real evidence in TWA800 ... testimony of operators that turned down the Clinton evidence destruction mission that was the Murrow building ... and why did bldg 7 come down in a controlled demolition? Believing the official story (magic bullet) without question is now the only way to protect yourself from being arrested “thought crime”.
I think we are going to see some of the longstanding cover-ups revisited by Trump ...
or lorena fuddy ...
Exactly... WWG1WGA
It is a way to shut down any and all discussion outside of official narratives.
And it should be remembered, civil and criminal conspiracy are in the law books.
From my reading, CIA is throughout the media, corporate world, and at various levels of govt. Parallel, unelected governance?
The FBI has been targeting conservatives for over twenty years.
They ignore Antifa... They ignored the man who shot up a Republican baseball practice.
There are goons in the FBI that function as the thug arm of the democrat party.
You assume Trump tweets every time he's unhappy with somebody in the executive branch. I don't make that assumption. And I don't think Trump is happy with his current FBI director, Wray, and I believe he will replace him when the time is right.
And it's not the FBI's, or government's place to warn against people who are committing no crime and who not advocating any violence, for example the Qtards.
I am glad Trump is barring Q stuff at his campaign rally. But that's a far different thing than the FBI warning about non violent free speech.
You bet it is.
Like people who believe Russian conspiracy theories? We can only believe in media approved conspiracies.
Trump tweets his unhappiness with somebody, what? Maybe once or twice a day? And besides that he's happy with everybody else and everything? Of course not.
If Trump truly wanted Wray gone, he would have had somebody fire Wray. This "waiting for the right time" is just making an excuse for a situation that may not even exist.
Last month Trump was asked he if supports Wray, and Trump said that "we'll see how that turns out".
To put it in a business perspective: I have a couple of businesses, plus have some input on a family-owned business. If I am unhappy with an employee and feel they need to be replaced, I don't sit around letting them collect a paycheck, waiting for the right time to replace them, and potentially giving them the chance to muck around with the business.
There's the problem with your argument right there. The Senate isn't required to confirm your family-owned business hires. You can't compare that to a chief executive nomination of an FBI director that requires Senate confirmation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.