Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Shouldn’t Dignify Impeachment Parody With a Trial
spectator.org ^ | September 30, 2019 | DAVID CATRON

Posted on 09/29/2019 10:34:15 PM PDT by ransomnote

Mitch McConnell told NPR last Friday that, if the House impeaches President Trump, “the Senate immediately goes into a trial.” This is music to Democratic ears, despite the infinitesimal chance of conviction, because they desperately need the sordid spectacle into which impeachment trials inevitably devolve. The Senate, however, isn’t required to try the President. That chamber possesses the “sole power to try all impeachments,” but is under no constitutional obligation to do so. The Democrats ignored House precedent and longstanding tradition to launch their “impeachment inquiry.” Why should Senate Republicans consider themselves bound by precedent and procedural rules where the trial is concerned?

The GOP can no longer afford to be timid about such niceties. The Democrats have long since declared war on Trump, the Republican Party, and the “deplorable” voters who support them. Senator Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) pointed out on the floor of the Senate last week that the Democrats began making plans for President Trump’s impeachment well before he was inaugurated. She noted that in December of 2016 the Democrats were already at work on a Senate bill whose sole purpose was to enable Democrats to exploit spurious conflict of interest allegations involving President-elect Trump’s business dealings and his official duties. The legislation was specifically conceived as an impeachment weapon:

The bill was tailor-made to transform conflict allegations into impeachable crimes. Keep in mind this bill was conceived before President Trump became President Trump. It was the beginning of a mission toward impeachment, even if they had to fabricate the means to get there. And let me tell you, they were determined to make it happen.… Yesterday, House Democrats, supported by their friends in the Senate, gathered to announce their intention to begin formal impeachment inquiries against President Trump.

MORE AT LINK

(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: impeachment; schiff

1 posted on 09/29/2019 10:34:15 PM PDT by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Well, politics might not allow such dignity.


2 posted on 09/29/2019 10:38:46 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Likely, Mitch loves this.

What’s he doing talking to NPR?


3 posted on 09/29/2019 10:46:08 PM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

That article should have been posted under news and editorial. The Spectator is one of the more distinguished and older conservative publications and is highly regarded.

That said, David Catron is right. The Senate should stop the farce in committee and allow it to go no further.


4 posted on 09/29/2019 10:52:31 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I’ll revise part of my comment. The Senate should simply dismiss the charges, because there was no impeachable offense.


5 posted on 09/29/2019 11:19:11 PM PDT by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: 8Man

Politicians have been known to change their minds from time to time.

Mitch may have been imagining a scenario somewhat less insane than the current scenario of Democrats throwing excrement at the wall to see what will stick.

It will be close enough to the 2020 elections to just let the voters decide.


7 posted on 09/30/2019 1:13:07 AM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

One thing this whole fiasco has made quite clear is that democrats are chickenshit A-holes.


8 posted on 09/30/2019 2:48:59 AM PDT by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop; mrs smith

9 posted on 09/30/2019 3:28:28 AM PDT by 4Liberty (The taxpayers can always take one more for the team. - The Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
I agree.As soon as the papers are finalized turning the matter over to the Senate McConnell should call a vote.Of course the vote will be something like 55-45...but that's to be expected.
10 posted on 09/30/2019 4:07:25 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (A joke: Brennan,Comey and Lynch walk into a Barr...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty

That’s probably a very true statement.


11 posted on 09/30/2019 4:15:40 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

In a trial PDJT gets to call any witness for any reason-under oath.

Let’s see. 0bama, Clinton, Brennan, Clapper, John Roberts (Obamacare ruling)...Schiff...the list is vast.


12 posted on 09/30/2019 4:16:15 AM PDT by combat_boots (TGod bless Israel and all who protect and defend her! Merry Christmas! In God We Trust! Hi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

That’s amusing.

Politicians need face time with the public so they can buy votes with tax dollars.

No way will any of them turn down the theater opportunity.


13 posted on 09/30/2019 4:21:35 AM PDT by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

American Spectator is of the highest repute. But...

“David Catron is a health care consultant and frequent contributor to The American Spectator.”

I like the sentiment, but the idea the Senate could withstand the outrage of NOT holding a trial, to me, is ludicrous on its face.

Of course there is no authority in government, not even judiciary, that can compel them to do so.

But, on the political front there would be at least 75 Senators insisting on the trial. Even if they all intend to vote not guilty.


14 posted on 09/30/2019 6:12:38 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

You are so right.
Please let the House bring imoeachment so the Senate can expose the vile evil lying hating Dens.


15 posted on 09/30/2019 6:14:03 AM PDT by RWGinger (Does anyone else really)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: combat_boots

It’s not a trial, it’s an impeachment conviction proceeding. His defense will be limited by what the Rinos and John Roberts say are the boundaries.


16 posted on 09/30/2019 1:57:31 PM PDT by damper99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson