Posted on 10/23/2019 7:54:40 PM PDT by Morgana
Kamala Harris is an ardent abortion activist — no pro-life voter could be addlepated about that.
But Harris wants to make sure Democrat presidential primary voters know she’s staunching in favor of abortion as many babies as possible, right up to birth. Harris is so pro-abortion she just told an audience that killing babies in abortions is something that should be declared “a priority.”
Naturally, Harris wrapped this horrific reality in language about so-called “reproductive rights.” Here’s more:
“We need to have presidential candidates indicate where they stand on it, and we need to declare it a priority like any other health-care priority,” Harris said in an interview with The Daily Iowan.
“Yet again, we were embarked on, you know, a very long discussion (about health care), and it hadn’t come up, and it affects over half the population,” Harris said to the DI, referring to what she sees as the lack of debate about women’s reproductive health care.
Harris told the DI that states such as Alabama that drastically tightened their abortion laws are “completely out of touch with reality.” Under Alabama’s law, doctors who perform a banned abortion would be charged with a Class-A felony and could face life in prison.
Harris highlighted reproductive rights in her stump speech, saying that state legislatures “dare to impede on a woman’s right to reproductive health care.”
So unless you support killing babies in abortions you’re out of touch with reality, Harris says without any sense about how she’s projecting.
During the debate, Harris said it wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say “women will die” because of restrictive women’s health-care laws passed by Republicans in state legislatures.
Except it’s a huge exaggeration. Harris was solidly refuted when she made the false claim. And even the liberal Washington Post recently debunked the myth. In May, the Post fact checker found what pro-life advocates have been saying for years: that few women died from illegal abortions in the decade prior to Roe v. Wade, and a rise in the use of antibiotics appears to be the biggest factor in the drop in maternal abortion deaths, not the legalization of abortions.
Keep up with the latest pro-life news and information on Twitter.
Dr. Bernard Nathanson, a former abortionist and co-founder of NARAL, admitted later in life that their “statistics” about back alley abortions were false. Nathanson said abortion activists often claimed between 5,000 and 10,000 women died every year from dangerous, back alley abortions and argued that legalizing abortions would protect women.
He wrote: “I confess that I knew that the figures were totally false and I suppose that others did too if they stopped to think of it. But in the ‘morality’ of our revolution, it was a useful figure, widely accepted … The overriding concern was to get the laws eliminated, and anything within reason that had to be done was permissible.”
Meanwhile, Harris wants to make it illegal for states to pass pro-life laws.
In Harris’ plan, The Reproductive Rights Act, there would be a “pre-clearance” requirement to make it harder for states to impose restrictions on abortion providers, including waiting periods and “imposing medically unnecessary doctor supervision requirements.” Her plan would also make any changes to abortion laws unenforceable until the Justice Department certifies it is in accordance with Roe v. Wade.
Never mind that the Constitution doesn’t allow the federal government to dictate what laws states can pass nor does it give the federal government authority to deep six laws it disapproves. Out of touch with reality indeed.
Margaret Sanger wanted all babies dead. Woman’s choice was not a matter to her she wanted them all dead
can we call them sick evil and possessed?
If only her mother had exercised that option.
Never mind that the Constitution doesn’t allow Indian/Jamaican nationals to be President.
In south Louisiana a popular bumper sticker reads, “Ya mama was pro-life, darlin’”.
She is one sick witch.
Those of us who are opposed to abortion and want it to end should call ourselves abolitionists.
“...If only her mother had exercised that option....”
Yep...for sure.
However, the better part of old “heels-up” ran down her mama’s thigh.
Indeed. Harris is just trying to be outrageous and controversial because she’s at 3.2 % and not eligible for the office anyway
Evil incarnate.
She’s supporting the eugenics of an organization whose founder wanted “to exterminate the Negro race.”
Let us be thankful Camel-toes’s days as a presidential candidate are numbered.
To use Alas Babylon’s fav term, Harris is a NOPE*.
*NOPE = “Never Obtain the Presidency, Ever”
Willie Brown’s ho can go abort herself.
Baby killer!
“Margaret Sanger wanted all babies dead. Woman’s choice was not a matter to her she wanted them all dead”
Adolph Hitler was a great admirer of Sanger.
In my opinion Harris is the most dangerous of all the Rats running. She is one very Evil, filthy -itch. She is Obama in Drag.
Liberals are insane.
Harris’s objective is to attract more campaign money from the Abortion Industry. In effect she wants to sell the lives of countless babies for her own personal gain. Didn’t we see the same thing in Nazi Germany?
Didn’t we sing along with these lyrics by Donovan and Shawn Phillips, released in September 1966:
When I look out my window,
many sights to see.
And when I look in my window,
so many different people to be.
That its strange.
So strange.
You got to pick up every stitch. Must be the season of the witch,
must be the season of the witch, yeah,
must be the season of the witch.
Margaret Sanger (newsreel) - ‘No More Babies (for a period of 10 years, a woman’s choice in the matter be damned)” (1947)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChCjgYGTL4Y
So far the US has murdered sixty million children and continues to do so.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.