Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: LibWhacker

“detect a shift of a trillionth of the diameter of a proton.”

You’ll be comforted to note that elsewhere in the article it says they only need to detect a whopping “few thousandths of the width of a proton,” on the order of a trillionth of a micron.

A micron is still sizable in many ways. A person can feel texture features down to about 1/100 of a micron in size.


8 posted on 12/10/2019 2:38:20 PM PST by rightwingcrazy (;-,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rightwingcrazy

My machines here have a repeatability of 1 micron. Unless the sun reflects off a shiny surface too long, or the idiots leave the door open on a cold or hot day, or a hundred other variables.
To detect a shift as small as they are referring to mind blowing to someone in my trade.


17 posted on 12/10/2019 2:59:46 PM PST by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: rightwingcrazy; Abathar

The official Caltech support site to my local LIGO (Hanford), says down to 1/10,000 the width of the proton charge nucleus. Since that web material gets reviewed by incoming graduate students all the time it is probably correct. The other statistic that amazes me is the vacuum inside the 4km tubes at a pressure lower than interstellar space (and maintained for long periods).


22 posted on 12/10/2019 3:32:40 PM PST by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson