One problem with your theory: The witness process will be that each witness will be proposed one at a time, and the Senate will then vote to approve or deny each witness in turn.
That there are enough turncoat RINOs to force witnesses in the first place means that there are enough RINO votes to block each Trump witness while approving every Dem witness.
The only fair way is to negotiate an entire list of all witnesses, and then have the Senate vote on that list.
But that is not the process. See the problem?
What precludes them from Voting against Calling Joe Biden?
After Voting for Bolton?
The Dems have got their way thus far.
I dont believe for a second they call Joe Biden, because that opens up too much exposure. Hunter is a Private Citizen and a different animal.
They vote first for any Witnesses.
They better call the Whistleblower. There is talk that Bolton was one of the sources for the Whistleblower. The fact the Whistleblower has remained anonymous and off-limits may account for Boltons changed stance on testifying.
The Whistleblower was also leaking like crazy to Media for an extended time before his complaint.
I don’t think you’re right, but I hope I am wrong. I think the dems will get one or two of their witnesses. Trump will get none, or maybe just one that really has nothing to offer.
You are correct they are ALL corrupt NO CHANCE in hell they will start bringing in witnesses the only damn innocent person in this Ukraine corruption IS Trump!!!! Something REALLY needs to be done to DRAIN THE SWAMP!! Our tax dollars are going for this aid ALL OVER the world THEN it is funneled right back into these legislators pockets I AM PISSED!!! These bastards have the best of everything on our dime and that is not enough they are raping ALL of us through aid our tax dollars pay to other countries SCUM all of them!! You can bet your bottom dollar there will be no witnesses!! This is EXACTLY the same BS that was going on with the Clinton Foundation AND it still going on!!!
Now who could argue with that?
Sorry, but the indications are that there will be witnesses - all for the prosecution.
The President’s legal team said they will go to court to preserve executive privilege and block witnesses from testifying. The Democrats are very reluctant to have any court weigh in on this issue.
It is totally wrong for the jury/ senate to try to save or bolster the failed prosecution/ house case. And there will be plenty of opportunity after these phony charges are dismissed to investigate the Biden family corruption mess, etc.
To anyone in the federal government of any consequence please note that regular Americans are watching you and were not at all impressed with either you, your asinine ideas, or the turgid drek that spills out of your misshapen heads when you lie to the cameras.
What kind of a scam is voting on Witnesses anyway? If a person is to put on their defense then they call the witnesses they want. The fact that Witnesses need to be voted on is a scheme in itself.
Youre delusional
The RINOs know this and they know its literally impossible to convict him and have him removed from office at this point. Zero percent chance they force him out 9 months prior to this election.
Any RINO that voted along those lines knows damn well they will be primaried.
There are only 2 outcomes at this point.
Trump is acquitted. Or, each side gets witnesses.
Why waste the Senate's time with witnesses when the charges aren't impeachable in the first place?
A vote for witnesses is a rejection of the Trump team's core argument. Why would McConnell want to allow that?
-PJ
If you only knew how bad it really is...
Mene Mene Tekel Upharsin
The Senate must acquit, based on the fact that there is no crime & Articles are not Constitutionally coherent. Any other decision will prove the majority of both bodies of Congress is corrupt.
Let’s face it. If there are Senators that want lots of free time on all the major news programs for the next 10 months, there will be witnesses.
President Trump's legal team
Shows no fear and is armed with truth.
Do they want more Pam Bondi? LOL
I don't think so.
Hope so, as this does NOT need to drag out, and also they won’t call the “right” witnesses.
But there are at least 3 wafflers, not counting Toomey and Gardner.