Nope. Neither do I.
Bad act by police.
Can you say ‘jury nullification’?
I can...
And they didn’t do squat about online Antifa organizers for the last three years. Spit.
yeah disparate treatment, no protests allowed for citizens, but sanctuary cities for illegal aliens..calif $ucks
Is that what you call a “political prisoner?”
And, the ACLU will rush to her defense in.....oh, nevermind.
FTP
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
The Calinazi state strikes again
So “civil rights activists” now what the Police to cite people for protesting when the government doesn’t want them to. They had no problem with BLM, Anti-trump, Anti-Bush, etc. protests.
Just got off the phone with a friend in the Bay Area. He tried to buy stuff at the cashier at Safeway. He had his mask on backwards and they would not take his credit card. He complained and the store called the Sheriff. The Sheriff was there in minutes ... my friend had just left and saw the Sheriff pull up looking for him. So is that what Calif has come to ? Arresting someone for not wearing their mask in the approved way ?Can you say police state ?
Communism
The appropriate response is another much bigger protest.
President Trump sets them up and liberals take the bait.... every time! The expose themselves as the totalitarians they are AND the voters see it.
You guys are really giving the other good guys with a badge a bad reputation.
JBT
And the 14th Amendment was enacted AFTER the Civil War, so no judicial decisions prior to enactment of the 14th Amendment are controlling. AFAIK, there aren't any federal court rulings since the 14th Amendment's enactment on whether emergencies such as epidemics can be used by state or local governments to justify prohibition of petitions for redress of grievances.
So, at this time, the only justification for such a prohition that I know of is a proclamatiion of martial law by a state governor, though the latter can do so retroactively to justify actions taken by local authorities during the heat of a new emergency before a governor has time to consider the matter.
I’m just trying to see how this would fly in the courts. You’re punished for organizing a protest against a stay at home order by enforcing the stay at home order?
It’s not martial law, no one has suspended the constitution, and effectively it’s a 24 hour a day never ending curfew with no defined standards for when it ends. And issued by the unelected ‘county health officer’? They’re just making stuff up as they go along, and one day it will be considered by the federal courts and probably be found to be wanting.
Since the law presently offers freedom of movement for ‘essential tasks’, then I’d say quite clearly that exerting the most basic human right of protest against the government is absolutely an essential task and requires no permission from the government to do.
What SD Municipal Code did she violate?
Nope. Neither do I.