NASTY Pa-Lousy
Who is “we,” witch? Many of “us” think mail voting is fraud bait.
If Nancy thinks she’s Trumps equal , than why doesn’t she just do it herself ,LOL
On the plus side, she’s spotlighting voter fraud.
Hopefully President Trump acts accordingly.
Let’s just end the vote and let the revolution begin.
In November, people can go to the polls, they will be less crowded than the supermarkets everyone is going to today.
Trump need to tweet-
“Over my dead body”.
NASTY Pa-Lousy
If a poor country can print 800,000,000 voter ID’s with photo, and no one can vote without that ID, Pelosi wants mail in voting? Does she think we are stupid and insane?
DEMAND! funny. Will be hilarious when we take back the house and she is screaming this from the basement
Does she now want mail in grocery shopping,?
Its not just about not passing this.
Conservatives need to grow some spine, ignore the charges of “racist” and begin to attack all the voting fraud measures this country now accepts
No ID voting
Same Day registration
Early voting
internet/e-voting
absentee ballots for anyone except government deployed overseas
ALL are means for fraud. Its time to push back agains them.
What if the return address says Tijuana?
Does that vote count Nancy?
How about a pint of ice cream, WineBox?
As usual, “Nanny” Pelosi, one of the USA’s most prominent & SELF-IMPORTANT LOUDMOUTHS, is in NO position to demand anything.
(I strongly suspect that in January 2021, she will no longer be anything but just another WHINER in the minority party of Congress.)
Yours, TMN78247
“We demand”
What do you call a person that likes to make demands, if they get in power?
Here is what we know.....
Voter fraud and voter manipulation is easier with mail-in ballots. That is common sense as there are few safeguards with such a system.
However, while many here and on the right (including me) assume there is widespread voter fraud, the number of “smoking gun cases” is slim. While there are stories and a few prosecutions here or there, how come we don’t have something very compelling to moderates to prove our assertion?
Why has Project Veritas or other investigative journalists been able to show solid evidence of this? I have read some pretty damning pieces, but how is all of this allowed to remain hidden where we are forced to put our case together via mostly anecdotal evidence?
Why has the GOP not made a lot of noise about this subject and pushed the anecdotal evidence?
I follow the news closely and frankly I expect a smoking gun every election, but it seems like none of these stories ever gain traction or go anywhere.
Ballot harvesting should be illegal.
Busing voters to polls for cigarettes, gift cards, and other “compensation” should be illegal.
Voter rolls should be cleaned up and verified in between each election.
Last minute registrations and absentee ballots should be scrutinized after each election.
We all agree on this, but we are left to speculate after every election about “voter fraud” and how are we making our case about the ways we believe votes are manipulated or fraudulent?
While I definitely believe voter fraud happens, why can “we” not make a better case for it? Why doesn’t Trump talk about this? Why can we not better explain this to the public in a way the MSM cannot ignore or dismiss? They call everything “racist” so who cares anymore.... let’s have a national discussion about it.
What happened in California in this last election with ballot harvesting was beyond curious. Statistically, we did not seem the same trend in the rest of the nation. Why not focus on that? How hard would it be to interview a few hundred voters who had someone bring them a ballot and drop it off? File lawsuits. Publicize interviews like some I have seen of confused people who claim someone else filled out their ballot!
We cannot rely on idle speculation to prove our suggestion of voter fraud. We either make the case or it will be dismissed as simple conspiracy theory.
Probably will happen as a result of the 2024 election...
Republicans preparing for the fight... They are determined to force a bipartisan agreement that the dear leader will only be allowed to rule for no longer than 50 years and republicans will be allowed keep their office when they switch parties...
She is demanding that RATs have an easier way to commit election fraud.
Up yours Nancy.