Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bitt
What does U.S. vs Sullivan have to do with Flynn?

Is the IRS involved some where?

9 posted on 06/11/2020 7:40:02 PM PDT by Deaf Smith (When a Texan takes his chances, chances will be taken that's for sureexist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Deaf Smith

DOJ


12 posted on 06/11/2020 7:46:10 PM PDT by gcparent (Justice Brett Kavanaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Deaf Smith

I believe this court will hear the Flynn team’s request to have Sullivan removed from the case. It should be interesting to hear the legal basis for that request.

I will be looking to see if gross incompetence is a legal justification for removing a judge from a case.


19 posted on 06/11/2020 8:10:42 PM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Deaf Smith

Because the DOJ filed the motion to dismiss, so Powell withdrew Flynn’s motion to dismiss and adopted the arguments of the DOJ.

In essence, the DOJ then became the lead party in the Petition for the Writ of Mandamus. When the DOJ, after filing a amicus brief at the invitation of the COA, Sullivan then had to respond to both the U.S. Goverment and Sidney Powell. Having the DOJ as the lead party in this action increases the odds that it will be granted, so much so that the result is a slam dunk.

Powell was allowed to submit the appellant brief and also a reply brief after Sullivan submitted his answer.


21 posted on 06/11/2020 8:20:09 PM PDT by WASCWatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson