Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: reasonisfaith

I should have clarified it. For the easily manipulatable, it would have been about slavery. But for those at the top, it would have been about keeping wages as low as possible for as long as possible, so they can buy up southern assets for a song.

I see a lot of the same movements in this as I do with globalism, where those advocating open borders to keep wage earners earning as little as possible for as long as possible.


18 posted on 08/12/2020 2:45:51 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is thp at they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

It also would lead to more, and richer, consumers to sell to.
It wasn’t just the cheap labor.
(Also there was the issue of the declining contribution of the South to the Fed government while the South maintained effectively equal representation there.)

Very similar to the situation in China 20 years ago.
Of course Western investors were much kinder to China.


25 posted on 08/12/2020 2:52:38 PM PDT by mrsmith (`(US MEDIA: " Every 'White' cop is a criminal! And all the 'non-white' criminals saints!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

You’re making up something that YOU think “makes sense” but you know nothing of historic reality.
“Those at the top” included powerful republican senators who demanded an end to slavery as their biblical duty.

Further, the South started the war by seceding, it was not in the hands of “Northern industrialists”.

You need to learn things, not sit around in a bull session making up what “must have been true”. It wasn’t.


32 posted on 08/12/2020 2:58:29 PM PDT by Williams (Stop Tolerating The Intolerant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

You said, “For the easily manipulatable, it would have been about slavery.“

This is an astonishingly ignorant statement.


65 posted on 08/12/2020 3:35:58 PM PDT by quicksilver123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

As Limbaugh says... follow the money.

There was a moral component against slavery. The largest was still economic and also political. 4 mil freed former slaves could have gone in several unintended directions.

1) a backlash army against whites and the USA.

2) 4 mil new republican voters.

3) they could have elected to go back to Africa and that would be minus 4 mil workers.

Monet is the driver. Since ALL finance went through NYC it was in the interest of the bankers and industrialists to soft land any I insurrection.


84 posted on 08/12/2020 3:57:19 PM PDT by Ouderkirk (Life is about ass, you're either covering, hauling, laughing, kicking, kissing, or behaving like one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

The most manipulated to now are those who believe the Civil War wasn’t about slavery, and that the democrats weren’t responsible for slavery.

The most manipulated include those who think the party of racism is not the democratic party.


275 posted on 08/14/2020 12:42:59 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (What are the implications if the Resurrection of Christ is a true event in history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson