[ClearCase_guy]

Science Deniers are happy to deny the science, if it helps the Narrative. They choose Truth over Facts.

[SeekAndFind]

Ping for your perusal.

This study analyzes deaths per capita with data from [Our World in Data]. To determine the effectiveness of treatment, the study could compare the death rates for the entire populations in the treatment and control groups, however they use the average of the individual country rates in each group in order to minimize effects due to differences between countries. Since randomization was done at a coarse country level, adjustments were made for differences between countries and analyze confounding factors.

Case statistics.

Study analyzes deaths rather than cases because case numbers are highly dependent on the degree of testing effort, criteria for testing, the accuracy and availability of tests, accuracy of reporting, and because there is very high variability in case severity, including a high percentage of asymptomatic cases.

[Widget Jr]

The good: Has lots of data from lots of countries. Critics of HCQ in the U.S. cannot actually stop other countries from using it. Those other countries are getting their own data and performing their own analytics, no matter what CNN says.

The bad: Who owns and is running this site? HCQ advocates like Dr. Zelenko and Raoult don't hide behind anonymity, and URL registrations are not really secret.

[Luigi Vasellini]

great HCQ links