Wasn’t there human hemoglobin found in the Shroud? And various pollens from first-century Judea? And what about the photographic-negative quality of the image, not to mention the anatomical accuracy of the nail holes through the wrists, vs. the palms?
This, and this alone, destroys any idea of the Shroud being a fraud from the Middle Ages.
Yes to Human hemoglobin and pollens from the Jerusalem area, not to mention anatomical accuracy of the nails through the wrists/palms. However it is not a a photographic 3D image. It’s a 3D terrain map which is not photographic, having nothing to do with photography, but rather to do with the an analog inverse representation of the distance of the body to the skin represented by the darkness of the image which dissipates at about 10cm from the cloth visually, and at about 20cm even under computer enhancement. This computer enhancement allows us to know that the Man on the Shroud was circumcised (per Barry Schwortz, principal Light Photographer STURP).