Looks to me it is work for a mathematician and not a physicist.
Mathematics are all about solving paradoxes between two theories or results, in the abstract.
I have zero confidence in today’s physicists in advancing physics theory because the mother topic of such is Philosophy. Back in the days of Einstein and especially before, the scientists like Newton were philosophers and they based their science on philosophy. Now we do the opposite, which is absurd. The result is politization of science and a high difficulty in parsing real science from BSers writing bobo articles for fund raising.
Agreed 100%.
Case in point is the silliscience claims about atmospheric CO2 levels causing climate change. Pure silliness.
The “scientists” have their climate model upside down (to climate alarmists: the atmosphere is NOT the controlling mechanism in climate), and consequently all their theories and suppositions are nonsensical.
Climate is a thermodynamic system, and the atmosphere is too flimsy to contain thermal content for long - a couple of days, at best.
+++