|
Posted on 12/08/2020 2:07:50 PM PST by ransomnote
(h/t foldspace)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
It seems to me there are some interesting legal issues involved in the new SCOTUS case. It seems clear that Texas has standing, as the outcome of these states’ elections effects the citizens of Texas.
It should be easy enough to prove that these states violated Article II Section I Clause II of the Constitution when the state courts, using court orders, imposed de facto changes to election law without the approval of the state legislatures. But no court likes to take up a case unless the violation being cited can be shown to have effected the outcome. If some Constitutional violation could be shown to have occurred but it only occurred in one small precinct, SCOTUS would almost never take the case, because it could likely be shown that the violation didn’t effect the final outcome.
So Paxon needs to show not just violation of the Constitution, but needs to prove that the violation likely changed the outcome. Since they’re arguing this on Constitutional grounds, it’s unclear to me the degree to which they can use evidence of fraud to make their case. For example, Dominion vote switching effected the outcome, but the vote switching is a criminal violation of the law, not a violation of Article II Section I Clause II. It seems to me that they would have to prove that Constitutional violations alone (i.e. Court orders that allowed late ballots to be accepted, signature validations to be waived, etc.) changed the outcome of the election. Should still be easy enough to prove, I would imagine,
but the argument will be a little less straight forward than it would be if the broader issues of voter fraud, voter intimidation, etc. were allowed to be presented. That’s my take anyway. I’m not a lawyer.
He also disputed a claim that an algorithm weighed votes for Biden greater than votes for Trump, noting again that the paper ballot records would reveal.....
The algorithm would give Biden the lead on paper the fake ballots would ensure the number would come out right in a recount. You need both for the fraud, they created the fake voters in the adjudication process.
Go out to dinner and Q drops.
So glad to hear from you Q!
ThanQ for the new thread. the last thread was pretty decent, even with the rabble-rousers.
Remember, VP Pence breaks all ties until 01/20/2021 @ noon.
So let’s keep our eyes on the prize and drag the repubs over the GA Senate finish line.
Then... Let’s Finish This!
The bots trigger true believers. It's like shooting fish in a barrel. This is textbook IIA activity happening to little ole me.
Tuscaloosa Goldfinch wrote:
“
https://twitter.com/RealBasedMAGA
SEVEN MORE STATES REPORTEDLY JOINING THE TEXAS SUIT
Arkansas
Alabama
Florida
Kentucky
Mississippi
South Carolina
South Dakota
“
Plus Louisiana & Texas makes 9.
WWG1WGA !!
Here’s the text of my email to Idaho Attorney General Lawrence Wasden:
Will Idaho join Texas in its lawsuit before the US Supreme Court, charging MI, WI, PA, and GA have violated election rules in the 2020 election? The suit charges that election procedures were changed by state and local officials, and not by the legislatures, as required by the Constitution. Additionally, differences in voting rules and procedures in different counties within the states violate the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause. I think it is imperative that we make our voice heard in support of this suit, as we would suffer injury to our voting rights if these changes were allowed to stand, and subvert the Constitution.
Please feel free to use this in your email to your state’s AG. I also called his office, got voicemail and left a similar message. Let’s get on this!
Wooh Hoo, New Q, Too.
Durham?
It will likely include the fact that despite the obvious fraud, the states certified the election. Further the states violated their own state constitution by changing election rules without legislative action. I’m still liking the 1997 9-0 SCOTUS ruling that election DAY is just that. A day.
Great stuff #1.
Where did you get the list of 8 good guys? (Hoping it’s real and not just expert TWTRrolling.)
Bitt,
Many thankQs for this; more states are joining (h/t Tuscaloosa goldfinch)
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3913509/posts?page=76#76
Q+ IIRC Check out drops #505, 550 and 31
Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT:
The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert.
@MikeKelly PA’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi
Georgia is surrounded 😁
Judging from the comments on the direct link from the latest drop, it seems they’ve been having tech difficulties in the Forbidden City, and that Q drop actually dropped on the BritAnon board on kun.
It means it's been filed. However, I'm hearing now that the court will HEAR the case, but it needs moar sauce.
BREAKING REPORT: The UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT will hear the State of Texas' case claiming Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin & Georgia's ELECTION PROCESS violates the U.S. Constitution..— Chuck Callesto (@ChuckCallesto) December 8, 2020
COUNTrecount wrote:
“Jenna Ellis
@JennaEllisEsq
IMPORTANT POINT REPORTERS ARE MISSING IN PA SUIT:
The Supreme Court only denied emergency injunctive relief. In the order, it did NOT deny cert.
@MikeKelly PA’s suit is still pending before the U.S. Supreme Court.
https://supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?fi
ThankQ !!!
Bitt, info from Jenna one of the Trump Team atty’s .
In!!!!!!!!!
Wondering if Cruz will get to argue on behalf of Texas.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
