Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: sweetiepiezer

“SCOTUS took the case that would change the election results”

...PA alone wouldn’t do it.


42 posted on 12/08/2020 2:25:26 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers

Makes a lot of sense as an explanation.


66 posted on 12/08/2020 2:48:57 PM PST by Defiant (If the Media and Social Media are going to run things, when do we get to vote for them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

grey_whiskers wrote:


“SCOTUS took the case that would change the election results”

...PA alone wouldn’t do it.”

About that single PA case:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3913519/posts?page=18#18


“So I guess That’s that..right?”

No, despite what the MSM may want you to believe.

The PA case is still under consideration, just no immediate injunction.

The Texas case (much stronger) was taken up by the Supreme Court, and the state of Louisiana joined the case on the side of Texas, of course.

Lin Wood was also able to file his appeal with the Supreme Court today too.

Actually, this is the best day we’ve had yet.”


87 posted on 12/08/2020 3:13:40 PM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 retusrning after lurking since 2000))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson