Dang... I go off to watch a replay of Kayleigh spankin MSM and I still miss it.
ThanQ for the clean slate. If the last thread hadn’t degraded so early, we wouldn’t have needed this thread yet.
Was I complicit? yep, especially being like a couple days behind.
Next time my complicity will be current.
hey...Let’s Finish This !
Not really Q related, but if anyone is interested, there is a video from a couple days ago where election attorney Robert Barnes discusses the whole “standing” issue from the Texas case. The video is kind of long (about 2 hours total), but they get into the discussion about standing starting around 30 minutes or so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5IPEvYchMo
In Robert Barnes’ view, “standing” is a made up legal doctrine invented by the courts so that they can use it as a procedural way to not hear cases that they don’t want to hear. It does not exist in the Constitution, and it didn’t exist until the 1920s. Courts also use ripeness, mootness, laches, and other made up procedural doctrines to avoid taking cases that they don’t want.