|
Posted on 12/18/2020 12:00:19 AM PST by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
ThankQ for this post about GA special laws about election expiring 4 days before Nov 3rd:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3915734/posts?page=2850#2850
BROUGHT OVER:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In the Army campaign Inherent Resolve against ISIL, the first phase was called Abeyance (15-Jun-14 to 25 Nov-15). That phase was to degrade and reduce the combat effectiveness of the enemy.
The next phases are Intensification, Defeat, then Support and Stabilization. If you participated in a phase of the operation, you get a campaign star for that phase, and the privilege to a campaign banner or flag.
Is the President telling us that the first phase, which could mean holding the enemy in abeyance, has been completed?
And now, by all indications, we are entering the intensification phase of the operation?
According to Wikipedia, the campaign medal for Inherent Resolve features “the medal’s mailed fist and dagger represent “strength and courage in the defense of liberty and freedom”. The scorpion being impaled was chosen because, “The scorpion, symbolic for treachery and destruction, is found on most major land masses”.
So maybe the Revolution is not on hold, but the first phase of containing the enemy is complete? To me the photo implies if we participate in this Inherent Resolve, we should show strength and courage in the defense of liberty and freedom, and that the campaign is moving forward.
2,938 posted on 12/18/2020, 12:45:56 PM by hedgetrimmer
Attention to all who are part of the Digital Army. Take action by contacting Republican Senators and Representatives to object on January 6 when the Electoral College votes are to be counted.
Call them and e-mail them every day! This is what we can do to help. Even if the switchboards are busy, it still sends a message.
An example letter to send to your U.S. Senator (or any Republican Senators) from election law attorney Robert Barnes. He is claiming no copyright, so he wants this to get out there and be shared. Feel free to modify it or personalize it as needed.
Here it is:
****************************************************
Senator Letter Draft: No Copyright Claimed
Dear Senator,
I request you exercise your Constitutional and statutory authority to object to the certification of any elector from any state that refuses to allow a meaningful audit of the November general election for electors to the Presidency, which must include: 1) a re-canvass of the vote that authorizes independent confirmation of a signature match using the same standards the same election officials use for nomination petitions, recall petitions, and initiative petitions; 2) publishing of the ballots for the world to review and observe, as states promised when they wrote large taxpayer checks to election machine companies like Dominion and others; and 3) audited review of the voter rolls to insure only qualified voters cast ballots for electors to the Presidency. If a state refuses to allow an honest audit of the vote, then I request you object to the certification of any electors from that state which has refused such an audit. At present, this includes the electors from Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
There is reason for my concern. The state legislatures in the respective states chose a method for choosing electors to the Presidency that cabined who qualified to vote, constricted the manner in which a vote could be cast, and circumscribed how the vote could be counted. Many of the restrictions and requirements for each of those three were not followed by several of the states in question. President Carter warned in 2005 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. The New York Times agreed in 2012 that absentee ballots posed the greatest risk of fraud. Jurists, experts, and election officials all concurred that mass mail-in balloting posed the greatest risk of fraud. We just had the biggest absentee-ballot driven election in American history. Yet, the very safety guardrails of this election were systemically and systematically removed, often without the assent or consent of the state legislatures, despite the express promise and explicit protection of the Electors Clause to the Constitution. Midnight counts outside the meaningful observation of poll-watchers. 11% signature mismatches according to the Democratic expert in the election contest in Arizona. Votes from dead people, non-citizens, and non-residents found in the research of Matt Braynard and Richard Baris. Is it really too much to ask that states publish the ballots they promised to publish? Is it really too much to ask that states allow an independently confirmed signature match, at least to a statistically significant sample, of the absentee ballots? Is it really too much to ask for the states to affirm that only those qualified to vote cast ballots for the Presidency?
The Supreme Court directed any remedy to you, and Congress, when it declined to hear the case brought by the state of Texas, a suit joined by the Attorneys General for 18 states representing more than 100 million Americans, 126 members of Congress, high ranking state legislators from the objectionable elections of the states at issue, and public interest advocacy groups representing millions of Americans. I ask that you do me the small favor of simply objecting to electors under the circumstances herein described. At a minimum, it can give confidence to me, and more than 74 million Americans who voted for President Trump, that our concerns about this election were taken seriously and meaningfully addressed in the only place the courts have directed remedy can occur: the halls of Congress.
The Constitutional conscience of the country depends upon the choices you make. Many thanks for your kind attention to these critical concerns.
Thank You,
XXX
A Simple American
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3915734/posts?page=2871#2871
Maybe those extensions are traps, if hidenbiden undoes any, then he’s exposed...
Pretty good thread by Maximus at the following link:
https://twitter.com/Maximus_Legacy/status/1339951747473625089
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ https://factba.se/topic/calendarIs it happening???
Who is Trump meeting today at 3:30pm? pic.twitter.com/bxUmvxdR4Q— Ron (@CodeMonkeyZ) December 18, 2020
“This isn’t true. The current Pentagon team has given more transition meetings than were given in 2016.”
******
Grenell isn’t really denying that the briefings have stopped, but he is down playing it. It does appear that they have stopped till after the first of the year (at least).
DOD downplayed it, saying they had too many meetings scheduled, that they were having trouble keeping up. So you just cancel them?
On the one hand, it’s a very public slap in the face of Biden, on the other hand they are down playing it.
It insinuates that Biden’s team is a national security threat. You could have reduced the number of meetings, been careful what you shared with him, but to cancel them publicly? That is to send a message.
Axios says that it’s because Biden’s team leaked info about how much money stopping border wall would save. So DOD is trying to teach him a lesson? I don’t think that’s it.
This is a really big deal. Right after our gov and critical infrastructure is revealed to have been hacked for months in an ongoing attack, we just call off these briefings because there are too many of them and we will catch you after the first?
It’s more like the DOD washing their hands of Biden, like, “We aren’t even going to lie to the SOB anymore, keep them out of here,” then putting on a semi polite face about it publicly.
I like that take on the situation.
https://twitter.com/W7VOA/status/1339977963522170880
Steve Herman
@W7VOA
The @WhiteHouse media pool was summoned to gather and then was dismissed with no explanation.
The pool members, many of whom were interviewing @larry_kudlow outside, had been summoned for an event in the Cabinet Room.
“After being called to gather at about 11:30am, the pool was told a few minutes later that it was a false alarm and that there was no longer a need for us,” notes print pooler @Brett_Samuels27
“We were given no further details other than being told whatever the president is doing is remaining closed to the press. ... I’ve asked if there’s any additional info on what the president is doing and will pass along updates,” adds @Brett_Samuels27.
An executive of a US telecom firm indicted for illegally shutting down web conferencing meetings on orders from Chinese intelligence. Looks like Company 1 may be Webex?
RSBN: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9WAQHu8NVU
Maricopa County Board of Supervisors were to meet to discuss how they can defy Arizona legislature subpoena to review their election materials. They then went into “Executive Session” to scheme and have not emerged from hiding since. TBD + WWG1WGA :)
Biden concedes when he realizes that is his best choice.
************
He can’t. He wouldn’t be allowed to even if he wanted to, which he won’t want because the charges against him, his family, and all those of the deep state that are pushing him are so devastating that for them to survive in a totally non-metaphorical meaning of that is for Trump to be removed.
Ha Freaking HA!
for sure
DEVELOPING: Trump to Meet with Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller in the Oval Office at 3:30 PM
This FReeQ can't help but wonder if "sidekick" E C-W is invited, as well...
TXnMA
You know, some people are going to think that is the actual rug in the oval office.
You know, some people are going to think that is the actual rug in the oval office.
Trump is going to do what Trump is going to do and no petition is going to change that now.
Good on ya
Happy New Year
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
