Josh Hawley on FBI Checking House Member Cell Phone Data: Frightening Stuff, There Has To Be Real Accountability (video)

Air TV ^ | 2/24/2021

[Beave Meister]

This video was taken from the Tucker Carlson show. The FBI Was caught taking personal data from conservative reps.

[Beave Meister]

The Fascist are out of control, and it will only get worse...

[brownsfan]

Sorry Sen. Hawley. The media is all in for this stuff. The public is stone stupid and won’t care unless their tv tells them to care. In fact, most of the elected members of your party are all in with this stuff too.

The slide into the abyss continues unabated.

[Lurkinanloomin]

The Federal Bureau of Incrimination And Sedition (FBIAS) is more of a danger to the citizens than what they pretend to protect us from.

[kiryandil]

“Security operatives”...

[DoodleDawg]

I’m assuming a warrant was required to do the check. Take it up with the court that allowed it.

[davidb56]

WTF is wrong with these people....its always blablabla. Always talk and then they dont do jack $hit. (apologies to Jack)

[DEPcom]

Reading articles about FBI tracking cellphones that ping off of DC Cellphone towers. This along is a good reason to leave your cellphone home.

Put your phone in a EMP bag away from protest area (before you leave home), then use handheld radios to communicate with friends and family.

Do not use the local free wifi to connect to your real social media and email accounts.

[NWFree]

This is what the fbi is - political hit team completely controlled by leftists and operate as the deep state police force.

[precisionshootist]

" The Federal Bureau of Incrimination And Sedition (FBIAS) is more of a danger to the citizens than what they pretend to protect us from."

But only a few at the top. The 99 percent of the rank and file are pure as the driven snow. LOL

Does Hannity still stand by this nonsense?

The FBI is totally corrupt top to bottom. They are the enforcement arm of the commie takeover of America.

[Cincinnatus.45-70]

Yep. An unaccountable oligarchy is in charge. It will indeed only get worse. Hawley asking for accountability strikes me as naive — or worse. if he is pretending to believe accountability is possible, is it because he is scared to tell the truth? Or because he is in on it?

[old curmudgeon]

J. Edgar Hoover was the first director of the FBI and remained its director until he died in 1972.

Hoover was a totally unethical slime ball of the 1St magnitude.

Much has been written about the methods he used to control people.

How can we expect an organization created by such a person to be clean?

We have been brain washed to believe the FBI consists of wonderful heroes when the fact is that the treatment of Martin Luther King, General Flynn, Roger Stone, Carter Page, Ruby Ridge, Richard Jarrell or Waco should have resulted in shutting the FBI down. Any single one of those events should been enough.

[Kevmo]

Hannity is just sticking with the traditional kneejerk conservative tendency to engage in bootlicking.

Also, there’s the typical point of “99% opf them are good people just doing their jobs” and yet they allowed a coup d’etat to take place right in front of their very eyes without a single one of them going into witness protection.

Our constitution is more important than their careers. Shiitecan the lot of them, let them feel the consequences of their inactions.

[Liz]

CIRCA 2020 Dems wondering who else in FBI ‘blabbed’ to Durham, may be scared enough to cut own deals
BizPacReview ^ | August 15, 2020 | Jon Dougherty / fr Posted on 8/15/2020, 5:06:51 PM by CheshireTheCat

The Wall Street Journal’s Bill McGurn said Friday it’s likely that Democrats are wondering who “blabbed” to U.S. Attorney John Durham after he announced that a top FBI lawyer would plead guilty to one count of altering evidence during the Russia probe into President Donald Trump’s 2016 campaign.

His comments come a day after Durham, who was appointed by Attorney General William Barr last year to look into the origins of the so-called “Spygate” counterintelligence investigation, announced that former FBI attorney Kevin Clinesmith agreed to plead guilty to altering a FISA court application to spy on then-candidate Trump before DOJ was able to review what was on them.

[ohioman]

“I’m assuming a warrant was required to do the check. Take it up with the court that allowed it.”

What a joke! The corrupt leftists scumbag courts in this country will do nothing about it. There are two sets of laws in this country and we are at the bottom of the Totem Pole.

[Liz]

WAS THE FBI SPYING ON HOUSE MEMBERS VIA MEMBERS' PAKI IT SPYMASTERS?
What role did Cali AG Becerra---Biden's HHS pick----play in this?

=======================================

It is crucial to remember that the House IT spymaster, Paki Imran Awan, worked for Cong Debbie/W/S who then-headed the DNC.
<><>The Paki clan IT'ed for dozens of elected Democrats on a shared basis.
<><> Some reports say almost 80 House Democrats employed the Paki IT's.

Taxpayers demand to know the extent of DNC assistance to
<><>(A) members of the House intelligence panel, and,
<><>(B) members of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

==========================================

> NEED TO KNOW

<><>Were Democrats' govt intel computers ever transported off-premises?

<><>Did the FBI and/or Secret Service accompany and supervise the transport of the Democrats' servers?

<><> Did the Awan clan have an active email account?

<><> Was there continuity of Democrat intel computer activity or did the intel computers ever go off-line?

<><> Who received Democrats' govt intel?

<><>Did the Awan clan get officially qualified by the DNC to handle intel data? (Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...

=========================

.....the DNC would not let FBI investigators review the DNC server.......
the DNC provided the FBI with analysis of a technical review
done through a cyber-security contract with Crowdstrike......

Onetime DNC head, D/W/S, should be investigated on this......
did her employee Imran Awan facilitate the cyber scam?

Wasserman Schultz had friends in high places at the time of the hack.

Riding on AF One with Obama.

cont

[Liz]

Cali AG Becerra has yet to answer for his outrageous conduct as a Congressman and House Democratic Caucus Chair.

As California’s top law enforcer, Cong Becerra knew, or should have known, US House policies are codified by law.
<><> House members are not allowed to accept services from people not on their payroll
<><> House employees are not permitted to log onto servers of members for whom they do not work.
<><> No scenario exists where the Awan clan’s access was even remotely appropriate.

Many House IT set-ups were “thin clients” (computers optimized for establishing remote connections w/ servers based elsewhere).

In 2016, the Pakistani Awan clan (suspected of being spies) worked as numerous House Democrats’ ITs
and used Becerra’s Democratic Caucus computers in anomalous ways:
<><> Authorities say Becerra’s entire Democratic Caucus server physically disappeared while being monitored by L/E.
<><> The Awans were using the House Democratic Caucus as their central service warehouse.
<><> The Awan clan collectively logged onto Becerra’s Caucus system 5,735 times, some 27 times per day
<><> Falsely logging onto Becerra’s laptop as system administrators.
<><> Changing their identities.
<><> Logging onto Cong Becerra’s server using 17 different user account credentials
<><> Some credentials the Paki’s used belonged to House Democrats.
<><> The Pakis did no IT work for 9 of the 17 offices to which these user accounts belonged.
<><> Investigations found “possible storage of sensitive House information” outside the House.
<><> Dropbox was installed on two Democratic Caucus computers used by the suspects.
<><> Two user accounts had thousands of files in their Dropbox folder on each computer.
<><> Using Dropbox is against House rules because it uploads files offsite.
<><> The Wash/Po reported “Based on the file names, some of the information is likely sensitive.”
<><> House computer set-ups were found to be portals to an outside computer.
<><> Awans were using terminal servers from a computer in a different location.
<><> Virtual Private Networks can make a server’s hard drive appear to be local to a computer.
<><> Remote sessions remained active for months at a time.
<><> Data was always out of [the members’] possession
<><> Other Democrat offices were accessed in total less than 60 times.
<><> The pattern of login activity suggests steps were taken to conceal the Pakis’ suspect activity.
<><> The aggregation of multiple members’ data would mean all that data was taken when the Paki’s absconded.

[DesertRhino]

The NKVD-FBI and the Party can look anywhere they please. Why do yo mind unless you have something to hide?

[Liz]

Did the NY Times admit — and defend — Obama’s FBI spying on Trump?
NYPOST.COM ^ | may 4, 2019 | Michael Goodwin / FRPosted on 6/15/2019, 7:16:44 AM by Liz

The NYT is reporting Obama's FBI sent a “cloaked investigator” to London to meet with Trump aide George Papadopoulos in Sept 2016.....spinning news designed to protect deep-state sources. AG Barr’s promise to investigate the investigators spooked the Deep State. The result is news with a “modified limited hangout” approach, where fragments are presented as revelations while the full picture ­remains artfully hidden.

The NYT story repeatedly suggests Azra Turk is an FBI agent, but doesn’t say so directly probably means she isn’t. Reporter Adam Goldman, told CNN they called Turk a government investigator “for a reason, and I’m going to leave it at that”.....said the deep-state errand boy.

Naturally, all sources are anonymous, identified generally as “people familiar with the operation.” My guess is they include Jim Comey, Andrew McCabe and other dirty cops worried they are in Barr’s crosshairs. They should worry, especially about Barr’s probe into leaks. There is no question that FBI officials were among the same reporters’ sources all along as the Times painted Trump as a Russian agent.

Which is why the NYT assures readers there was nothing amiss in the Obama-ordered spying, arguing that the existence of an “operation aimed at a presidential campaign” reveals “the level of alarm inside the FBI” over Russian ­efforts to disrupt the 2016 election......an odd and extremely biased way to describe the possibly illegal ­effort by the Obama admin to spy on the presidential campaign of the opposition.

Imagine how that sentence would be written if a Republican president spied on a Democratic candidate.

And why are the reporters certain the spying was legitimate and not a plot to stop Trump from being elected? Because their sources say so, making this a powerful example of why the Times was wrong to abolish its standards. (Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

==========================

NYT's seems certain the Obama spying was legitimate and not a plot to stop Trump from being elected.....if that's true why didnt they go after the Russians instead of Trump and his campaign apparat?

The scared-stiff Obama dictatorship feared Trump. The lawless Obama had plenty to hide. They were counting on Hillary to sweep it all under the rug. Obama ordered (A) the entire US intel apparat (created to protect American safety and security), and, (B) suck-up Eric Holder's DOJ, to spy on the Trump campaign, the Trump transition and the Trump presidency.

Explains the goofy OMG face on the goon-faced Halfrican when he met the impressive president-elect.
The dirt Hillary was supposed to sweep under the rug is now in the hands of the man the Halfrican tried to destroy.

"After all we did for her, that lousy Hillary lost. "How’m I gonna get out of the mess I’m in?"
"I know, we’ll invent Russian collusion..lie like crazy...setup Trump to take the blame.”

[DesertRhino]

And there probably was no warrant. It was at most a Patriot act national security letter requiring no court created by Bush to take the place of warrants. Because you know, it’s a pain to have to go through the rubber stamp court process.
And in this era, realistically they probably just called the phone companies and asked.
The companies handed it over, and helped all they could, knowing that they are immune in the courts if they do anything the party wants.

[Organic Panic]

They have dehumanized us all “demostic terrorists” “insurrectionists” “white supremacists” now. They are going to be treating us accordingly.