VAERS SYSTEM CONTINUES TO HEAVILY THROTTLE! 59% AE'S = JABS FEB OR OLDER AS OF 5/28/2021

bitchute.com ^ | 5/29/2021 | welcometheeagle88 on Bitchute.

[metmom]

I guess I’m keeping good company.

[Steve Van Doorn]

except covid was designed to kill people. It simply didn't work as well as they expected.
Covid seems to have been altered in-vetro from the Simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) The virus that crossed the species barrier into humans, resulting in HIV-2 and HIV-1

Plasmodium Yoelii paracite gene that forms the spikes (atributing the P. vivax malaria infections can lead to severe disease and death, often due to splenomegaly (a pathologically enlarged spleen)) COVID-19, SARS and Bats Coronaviruses Genomes Peculiar Homologous RNA Sequences Jean Claude perez & Luc Montagnier NA_Sequences_Jean_Claude_perez_Luc_Montagnier update HIV MAN-MANIPULATED CORONAVIRUS EVOLUTION TRENDS (Jean-Claude Perez)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344153988_HIV_MAN-MANIPULATED_CORONAVIRUS_EVOLUTION_TRENDS

This report shows STAT1 gene in Covid which is used for gain of function. Which demonstrated to alter in vivo pathogenesis release of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nuclear Import Block Enhances Host Transcription in Human Lung Cells
Release of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nuclear Import Block Enhances Host Transcription in Human Lung Cells
https://jvi.asm.org/content/87/7/3885#ref-60

You need to get past the question if there're a few people that are willing to kill mass numbers of people. Because that is a physiological question which can easily be rationalized by a few twisted people which is all that is necessary for a large operation like this to take place. Compartmentalize the rest where not ever person knows the intentional outcome.

[Steve Van Doorn]

Thanks Treeless Branch. That report helps brake down that number.
“vaccines are 95 percent effective” comes from
They misleadingly calculate the “effective” number by calculating the reduction in infections from the vaccinated versus the placebo which was 0.74 (placebo)-0.04 (vax)=0.7 and then they divide that result by the total placebo cases to get the 95% effective rate: 0.7/0.74=0.95.
https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199/htm

It came from this Pfizer report. This report has a lot of interesting things in it that is simply nuts.

They're playing a shell game with the dosage with the Pfizer vaccine. They're NOT testing the vaccine at the standard dose.

From page 15 it says the doses they used for BNT162b2 the product that was shipped the dose that tested for was 30μg. The standard dose for the shot is 100μg
BNT162b1(BNT162 RNA-LNP vaccine utilizing modRNA and encoding the RBD): 10μg, 20μg,30μg, 100 μg
BNT162b2(BNT162 RNA-LNP vaccine utilizing modRNA and encoding the P2 S): 10μg, 20μg,30μg
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf

The other point from this they're testing with the Shedding of the vaccines but we know other coronavirus the medical industry does tell pregnant women to stay away from live virus vaccinated people. They're not doing that with covid which they're creating live viruses. (testing for shedding (Exposure During Pregnancy) page 67)