Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ransomnote
While an estimate of 1% of adverse are ever reported to the CDC in the first place

50% of recipients surveyed respond that they had fever so there should be about 100 million fevers in VAERS. 36,366 are reported so there's less than 0.04% reporting for fever in VAERS. But as seriousness of the event grows, reporting grows. There's no way the 1% you quote from here: https://digital.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/docs/publication/r18hs017045-lazarus-final-report-2011.pdf (the "Harvard" study) applies to deaths. The more serious the event, the more likely a report. You need to make or get an estimate for the death underreporting.

Then you need to multiply the deaths by the underreporting inverse to get deaths that should have been reported. Then you need to compare to 0.008 / 365 * 100 million * number of days. You might choose 7 days for deaths and get an estimate of 15,342 exoected deaths. WIthout that comparison the numbers are not meaningful.

10 posted on 05/29/2021 8:16:12 PM PDT by palmer (Democracy Dies Six Ways from Sunday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: palmer

The more serious the event, the more likely a report
~~~~~~~~~~~

The CDC is weaponized. It patented the SARS-1 virus and it likely patented the Covid virus -that would at least explain how they have been able to create a fake pandemic using a fake PCR test.

The CDC has lied, is lying, and will continue to lie. Therefore, I’m not going to assume they are careful to report deaths because that would interfere with their objectives in lying.


13 posted on 05/29/2021 8:31:00 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson