Posted on 06/15/2021 1:12:46 PM PDT by BurgessKoch
Of all the questions asked, words spoken, and ink spilled on the so-called “Capitol Siege” of January 6, 2021, none hold the key to the entire event quite like what Sen. Amy Klobuchar asked of Christopher Wray.
The Democrat from Minnesota asked the Trump-appointed FBI Director: Did the federal government infiltrate any of the so-called “militia” organizations claimed to be responsible for planning and executing the Capitol Siege?
Christopher Wray is able to uncomfortably weasel his way out of answering the question directly, partially because Klobuchar does him the courtesy of not asking him the question directly. Klobuchar instead asks the FBI director if he wishes he had infiltrated the militia organizations allegedly involved in 1/6 — assuming from the outset that there was in fact no infiltration, thereby providing the FBI director an easy way to avoid addressing the question one way or another.
Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:
In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies? Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)? Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)? WATCH: Check out Darren Beattie's latest interviews
From now on, all discussion of 1/6 must give way to a laser-like focus on the questions above, with an unwavering persistence at obtaining the answers.
If the narrative about 1/6 does not conform to the questions above, the American people will never learn the most important truth about what 1/6 is, and what kind of country they’re really living in.
If it turns out the federal government did in fact have undercover agents or confidential informants embedded within the so-called militia groups indicted for conspiring to obstruct the Senate certification on 1/6, the implications would be nothing short of seismic. Especially if such agents or informants enjoyed extremely senior-level positions within such groups.
One of the key consensus points among the FBI-DOJ and the regime media is the idea that, while 1/6 is primarily the fault of Trump-supporting QAnon-infused “domestic terrorists,” it is secondarily the fault of so-called “intelligence failures.”
Klobuchar’s own question at the March 2, 2021 FBI hearing (above) reinforces this “intelligence failure” narrative, but she is not alone. A five-month “bipartisan” Senate investigation recently arrived at the very same “intelligence failure” narrative to explain the breach of the Capitol and associated events on 1/6:
A bipartisan Senate investigation of the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection found security and intelligence failures at every level of government that led to the breach of the Capitol by a pro-Trump mob as lawmakers in a joint session were certifying the 2020 election.
The 95-page report, a product of a roughly five-month, joint probe by the Senate Homeland Security and Rules Committees, found significant breakdowns ranging “from federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence to a lack of planning and preparation by (U.S. Capitol Police) and law enforcement leadership.” There was no overall operational or staffing plan for that fateful day, a total failure of leadership, according to the committees. [ABC News]
If it turns out that the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, or a similar agency) had undercover agents or confidential informants embedded in any of the groups involved in 1/6, the “federal intelligence agencies failing to warn of a potential for violence” looks less like an innocent mistake and more like something sinister.
Indeed, if the federal government knew of a potential for violence in or around the Capitol on 1/6 and failed to call for heightened security, the agencies responsible may in fact be legally liable for the damages incurred during that day.
Bad news for Christopher Wray?
The author of this piece, Darren Beattie, will be on Tucker Carlson tonight to discuss the RevolverNews piece on 1/6
You mean like when nanzi vanished about 5 minutes before things got serious?
Since when are Three Percenters a “group”. I see III hats, hoodies, window sticker, et cetera all over my area. Never heard of or saw anything about any gatherings or events.
I would bet my last nickel that every aspect of this event was Instigated and Setup by Government Employee’s, BELIEVE NOTHING THEY SAY, EVER!!
Now where is my Brown Shirt?
Sieg Heil!
Both a failure and a setup would be my guess.
SEIU card carrying drones
I remember my impressions of the news that blared forth late in the day on 1/6/21. The news I heard, sounded like it was being read from a script. More than one news reader used similar terminology, “riot, coup, etc”, and several uniform lies were told to America, i.e. “armed insurrectionists, violent assault and break in, policeman bashed with fire extinguisher, etc.” all lies. Were this reports scripted? Why and how? I have no proof of foreknowledge of this type, but I wonder what other observers think?
In case anyone interested, I linked copies of Whistleblower @JohnHereToHelp’s posts describing their coordination of Pelosi’s private security force made of corrupt gov agencies to create the fake Jan 6 ‘insurrection.’
Yes, and since when are Proud Boys a “militia”?
“Militia” should not be a demonized derisive negative term. When citizens band together for a common purpose (eg, volunteer fire department) that is in fact a “militia”. This goes to the right to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances. The 2nd amendment recognizes the right to militias, armed ones at that. The “militia” is defined by law as all of the people capable of carrying arms. So don’t get sucked in letting “militia” be portrayed as a dirty word: it is an American birthright.
Where have I heard of that union?
I got it!
It was in Andrew Breitbart's documentary on Occupy Wall Street!
He was mingling in a crowd of one of those cities and tailed by two gorillas wearing SEIU hats. I think the union club house building was in the background.
SEIU. Must find out more, but you might be onto something! The thought occurred that they might have been the ones who killed him in LA.
Why didn’t the FBI reinforce the Capitol protection? Whose idea was it to deny the National Guard that was requested by head of Capitol Police? Did the person who made that decision have access to the FBI intel? Why did 38 per cent of the trespassers get invited in by Capitol Police?
Questions that beg to be asked, and must be answered.
Rat’s Reichstag Fire.
Interesting questions
bttt
There is definitely a pattern
p
Exactly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.