Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Franklin County (OH) judge orders COVID-19 vaccines as term of probation [but defendant don't want COVID injection, called ACLU! +_)(*&^%$#@]
ABC 6 In Your Side WSYX ^ | June 28, 2021 | Lisa Rantala

Posted on 07/09/2021 1:01:15 AM PDT by wannabegeek

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WSYX) — A Franklin County judge admits to WSYX that he’s mandating COVID-19 vaccinations as conditions of probation in his courtroom. Now, some offenders affected are speaking out to say it’s not right.

“The whole atmosphere of the courtroom changed,” said criminal offender Sylvaun Latham who was sentenced for a gun and drug charge last week before Common Pleas Court Judge Richard Frye. “Everyone had this look on their face. I broke character and asked (my attorney), ‘Can he do this?’”

Out of 20 sentencings Judge Frye conducted last week, three included requirements to get the vaccination within 30 days and provide proof to the probation department.

Judge Frye told WSYX that none of the offenders had a religious or medical objection to the unprecedented court-ordered terms.

“I know Judge Frye’s reputation,” said Latham. “I know he’s known for giving the max time. I don’t want to go to jail. I also don’t want to have five years probation.”

Latham told WSYX that his attorney struck a deal with prosecutors which was three years probation.

However, when he stood before the judge at sentencing, terms had changed. He said Judge Frye told him he could choose between five years probation or just one year on the condition that he receives the COVID-19 vaccine.

(Excerpt) Read more at abc6onyourside.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Health/Medicine; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: aclu; sentence; vaccine
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
The accused criminal offender  Sylvaun Latham knows better than some dead medical doctors, nurses, supposedly well educated useful idiots big pharma promoters' global mass muder plot to wipe out at least half of the human race not to take the jab.

“I’m shaking at this point. I don’t like where this is going,” said  Sylvaun Latham who decided on the terms of the vaccine in the moment. “I feel like it is an overstep especially when he asked me if I’d get it and I said I really don’t want to get it,” said Latham.

So far, Latham has not received the vaccine and plans to contact the ACLU. Judge Frye told WSYX that he does not know yet what he will do if any of the offenders ordered to take the vaccine refuse.

“That’s not like picking up trash,” said Latham. “I know I’m in your courtroom and you have the absolute say-so over things but I feel like, that’s my health.”

Neither the Ohio Attorney General or the Franklin County Prosecutor wanted to comment on the matter.

1 posted on 07/09/2021 1:01:15 AM PDT by wannabegeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

Washington State offers free marijuana to vaxxed people. Private organizations in Arizona and Washington D.C. are doing the same. And of course, there are the lotteries. New York, Maryland and California offer vaxxed people a chance to win thousands and even millions of dollars with their vaccination cards. These programs even have cute little names like “Vax & Scratch” and “Vax-A-Million.”

Ohio governor Mike DeWine started the dystopian vaccine lottery trend. The city of Columbus, Ohio is even offering people $100 to get the experimental shots. Now Ohio is using its criminal justice system to force experimental injections.


2 posted on 07/09/2021 1:08:45 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

What were the gun charges?

Probation appears a bit weak.


3 posted on 07/09/2021 1:11:55 AM PDT by tired&retired (Blessings )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

Da judge made a medical decision without consulting a doctor? Uh, oh.


4 posted on 07/09/2021 1:19:12 AM PDT by Libloather (Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

Is this really that much different than forcing someone to get sterilized in order to keep collecting welfare or other public benefits? I imagine the ACLU would be all over that kind of a mandate. A forced vax (that is really still experimental at this point) as a condition of release or parole seems more than a bit Orwellian.


5 posted on 07/09/2021 1:27:35 AM PDT by American Infidel (Instead of vilifying success, try to emulate it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek
It's a violation of the defendant's 8th amendment protection against cruel and unusual punishment.

-PJ

6 posted on 07/09/2021 1:58:00 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Infidel
"Is this really that much different than forcing someone to get sterilized~"


That was the first thing that popped into my head. The second thing, is that they are really trying hard to cull the herd.
7 posted on 07/09/2021 2:42:17 AM PDT by Bikkuri (If you're conservative, you're an "extremist." If you're liberal, you're an "activist.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

Witchdoctor threat. ❎

Witchdoctors use fear.

Come against this in the Blood Name of Jeseus!⛪


8 posted on 07/09/2021 2:49:10 AM PDT by Varsity Flight ( "War by the prophesies set before you." I Timothy 1:18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Why? The defendant had a choice. Maybe a bad one, but still a choice. Otherwise any sentence would have been stiffer and within sentencing guidelines.


9 posted on 07/09/2021 2:51:31 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

“The defendant had a choice.” - 5 years probation or 1 year probation plus vaxx

How does that make any sense logically or legally?

Nothing about how this vaccine has been handled by public officials makes any sense, unless seen from a 1984 perspective. This whole thing is trending in the direction that a similar “choice” is coming for us too: FEMA camps or Vaccine


10 posted on 07/09/2021 3:04:49 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks
So the choice was between cruel and unusual? Take the long term or the short-study injection?

As someone remarked in an earlier thread, once probation is over how do I turn off the vaccine? It's not like an ankle bracelet that can be removed or a passport that can be returned. The vaccine is forever, but the probation is not.

-PJ

11 posted on 07/09/2021 3:08:22 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (* LAAP = Left-wing Activist Agitprop Press (formerly known as the MSM))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Da judge made a medical decision without consulting a doctor? Uh, oh.

Kind of along the lines of what I too was thinking. I wonder if the Judge had a sheepskin on the wall behind his throne? Did he prove that he had a medical degree to be decreeing mandated vaccines? Is he a judge or a doctor?

12 posted on 07/09/2021 4:04:07 AM PDT by Ron H.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tired&retired

“Washington State offers free marijuana to vaxxed people. Private organizations in Arizona and Washington D.C. are doing the same.”

They call it “DOPE” for good reason.


13 posted on 07/09/2021 4:07:48 AM PDT by HKMk23 ('Tis plain that People lose their Christianity with their Liberties. -- Thomas Bradbury, 1712)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bikkuri

Sterilization fits the crime associated with it.

Mandatory vaccination has nothing to do with the crime or rehabilitation.


14 posted on 07/09/2021 4:43:56 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wannabegeek

No, he can’t do that. Kick him out of office.


15 posted on 07/09/2021 5:47:36 AM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I think you’re taking liberty with cruel and unusual. Checking in with a probation officer is cruel and unusual? I bet there are many people who would gladly exchange 5 years of probation for 2 years of incarceration.


16 posted on 07/09/2021 7:56:15 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ReaganGeneration2

Again, he had a choice. If it doesn’t make sense, then take the longer probation. I think his main peeve is he had a deal worked out that the judge chose not to accept. Which is the judges prerogative. Now if the judges only sentence was a shot then I see the issue.


17 posted on 07/09/2021 7:59:50 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

I know he had a choice, but it’s the logical connection between a jab (health issue) and probation time punishment/repayment/public safety (related to crime). They are not connected and his lawyer should appeal.

In other words, say that the judge’s job is to assess a fair sentence from a punishment/repayment/public safety perspective. Which apparently was the least-time probation. The jab is extraneous and outside his scope and a slippery slope, tyrannical ruling.


18 posted on 07/09/2021 8:13:44 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ReaganGeneration2

If his standard sentence would have been 5 years, I don’t see the problem. Unless there are strict guidelines, the judge has discretion in what he considers the greater good. Like having to help the victim with household chores or picking up trash along the highway in exchange for a reduced sentence.


19 posted on 07/09/2021 8:31:36 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

Can a judge force a conservative to work on the Biden campaign?


20 posted on 07/09/2021 9:04:23 AM PDT by ReaganGeneration2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson