They are against the audit because they were part of the fraud.
Looks like anyone against an audit WOULD be part of the fraud, but then those opposed would say say that a “third party” would tend to be suspicious. It makes it hard to say who is the honest guy here, unless they have a “D” behind their name which doesn’t necessarily make them suspicious, but it would tend to. My personal feeling is that any electronic machine use puts the whole system on suspicion. Too easy to manipulate the votes after the fact & we sure know how that seemed to work out in the last presidential election. To most thinking people it must have been pretty obvious that Biden/Harris were certainly far from the best possible candidates well before the election. Use of electronics should be restricted to only registering what was put down on a paper ballot. There should be nothing in the system that would allow any votes to be changed in any way. Is this how it is actually set up? I doubt it.