Posted on 07/19/2021 11:51:54 AM PDT by Red Badger
False cover advertising.
I wonder if he/she/it had to have the removethedickfromme and then the addapusstome surgery before before Sports Illustrated considered he/she/it a “woman”?
Use the Crocodile Dundee “clutch” to check.
Ach, Doktor Mengele’s successors did a good job on this one.
Agreed, the swimsuit issue of SI is the biggest selling issue of the year by far. Most heterosexual men are not going to buy this magazine with a tranny on the cover.
Men that buy this magazine(especially this issue) tend not to be woke. The last thing they are going to do is bring home something that their buddies are going to tease you about.
Whoever is the editor/manager of this magazine should be fired.
IF they were a public company, I would short their stock.
This could be the lowest selling swimsuit issue EVER.
“Thank God I’m not dating anymore. Landmines. Landmines everywhere.”
You’d need a DNA based sex test to make sure you were dating the real thing.
Sports Illustrated is pathetic.
Have not even touched one in 30 years.
Like the N.Y. Times it is not worth the paper it takes to produce.
You used to want to ask a potential partner for a STD test for HIV. Now you’d be more concerned about a DNA gender test.
I’m not gay, but a few of my friends are. Ive been in gay bars and your right there are definitely more gay blacks than you would expect to see in a normal bar. I think it’s because so many black men ditch their girlfriends that get pregnant.
It’s not a coincidence that many female high-fashion models look like prepubescent teenage boys.
Could be worse, they could have given the Cover to Jazz Jennings.
Completely expected. Ho hum.
Ask a Leftist Dude how much he is committed to supporting this Trans crap.
If he says he supports it, ask him if he would have Sex with a Tranny. Then ask him if he prefers pre-op or fully chopped.
If he says no or hesitates in answering in the affirmative, call him a Bigoted Homophobic Hater.
“Making women look like skinny twinks usually”
My mother, born in 1917, had a collection of antique women’s outfits and fashion magazines from when they started in the late teens. Going into WWI, women were completely covered with layers of clothing. Then the first fashion magazines started and they featured clothing created in Paris. The problem was the women then considered fashionable were Rubenesque. Rubens was a painter who liked “full figured” women. Those women didn’t look good in the fashions then coming off the drawing tables. So, to fix this, they used young boys as models for the new clothes. My mother showed me the pictures and, yes, you could tell. Boys. Not girls. Not women. Boys.
I was young and I asked her why this was so. She told me that the fashion designers were most likely homosexuals and they didn’t like women. To look good in the flappers* you had to basically look like a two-by-four.
I know a family from years ago (1960s) in Oregon. Father weak but mother strong. Boy and girl (not related) both adopted. Girl strong and boy weak. Boy came out in the late 1960s, moved to Southern California and passed from AIDS within just a few years.
“Another man doing the job for women!”
indeed ... just more proof that a man can do almost anything better than a woman, INCLUDING being a woman!
Checked out google images. Many pics of “IT” BUT NOT ONE IN A MICRO BIKINI.
That man has nice tits due to estrogen therapy but he still has his part of his junk. I would suspect his testicles are gone or suppressed with anti-androgenic drugs.
Per Austin Powers, “Its a Man Baby.” See below link.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
