Posted on 08/12/2021 5:22:23 PM PDT by Rightwing Conspiratr1
Did "corrected" vote totals from the 2020 election presented by Mike Lindell at his election fraud Cyber Symposium as "Truth" support the theory that fake ballots were injected into every state's official election returns? No, that's not true: Lindell's "Truth" totals add up to the same number of votes he calls "The Big Lie," which are the final tallies that have appeared in multiple official and unofficial sources. Those tallies were compiled without the aid of the data Lindell used in declaring the election was hacked. It is nonsensical that Lindell's "Truth" tally would match "Big Lie" tallies in state after state, since he and a Ph.D. chemist ally named Douglas Frank claim to know that many fake votes were injected in order to change the result.
(Excerpt) Read more at leadstories.com ...
Lead Stories is full of Democrats.
Is there somewhere posted the real numbers from Lindell or Powell?
Lead,Stories,is,democrats.
They LIE !!?
If I understood it right, the True numbers reflected only the cyber corrections. Not included were “ghost” voters, the deceased voters, the fraudulent mail-in ballots, voters no longer living in the area, etc.
‘Lead Stories’ = CIA fake storefront
You love to post this contrary democRat shit every day don’t you troll.
Do explain. I thought he explained it quite well. One thing does not a cause-effect make, as he explained. His R factor was when the odds align to a > .9 factor - as he said they were .994 if I remember correctly.
go ahead, curious what you heard as ‘poor understanding that the PhD has of the basic principle of correlation and causation and R factor.
Everything I've seen is in the form of slides and videos.
Why.
Mike specifically mentioned that the “Big Lie” figures were just based on the off-site manipulation of the vote totals from the packet logs. It did not include any manipulation programmed into the machines. The off-site manipulation was necessary because the Trump voters “broke” the algorithm built into the machines. That is why there had to be an injection of Biden votes after the counting pause.
Dr. Framk’s understanding of correlation is the same as any other statistician’s understanding: You run the correlation algorithm and see what you get.
It is necessary and okay for purposes of understanding the enemy. Please do not be so juvenile as to think every post on FR is from a friendly source. In this case the enemy makes bold assertions without evidence.
Lead Stores, a Facebook fact-checker. I thought they were somehow connected to China or Russia
Well, I don't care to be called juvenile. And I know there are a lot of Myth Romney "conservatives" around.
Back when I had FB just for kicks, I went to their page and fact-checked everything they had up. They were wrong on everything I could find. They finally blocked me.
He claimed that correlation of >0.95 was unusal and suspicious. It isn't. Nobody can run it on his data because he won't release it.
However I did build a spreadsheet on Ohio counties using the 1984 Presidential election vs. the 1980 Census. and got a correlation of 0.9993874795
This predates any possibility of internet hookup and most electronic voting machinery.
“...got a correlation of 0.9993874795.”
That definitely qualifies for boldly stating “Confidence is high!”
Big cities pretty much always had voting machines—and cheated—back in 1984.
Lindell’s constant promotion that he had Data Packets that would prove
China hacked the election WAS the Big Lie.
Nobody has ever explained why five key swing states stopped counting at the same time. It had to be a conspiracy. It could not be a random event.
The Big Lie v The Truth
I thought those numbers reflected only those votes algorithmically flipped by machines, so both pairs for each State MUST NECESSARILY add up to the same figure.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.