Posted on 09/16/2021 12:32:11 PM PDT by ChicagoConservative27
Having mental issues but not taking your meds doesn’t help anybody, especially those that surround you.
“he returns home [in her car], and she doesn’t”
Makes it REALLY hard to explain. “She told me to keep the car and then wandered out into the desert to have her bones picked clean by the coyotes.”
Or, “I dropped her off in Podunk Wyoming and drove her car home and started using it as my own.”
Gonna be a tough sell.
He stole her VAN and drive it 2000 miles away .
The mother received weird texts supposed from her . the mother says its not her .
His parent refused to reply to her calls or text fir weeks ,
The parents also hid HER VAN at there House and blocked These the police .
Thats grand theft and crossing state lines with a stolen van is FBI territory !
The local moron cops cant drag these evil yankees in for questioning. with a stolen van that they hid from her parents .
"Also," they added, "there is still no evidence of widespread voter fraud."
Yep - ‘tis a puzzlement. The lawyering up thing is what’s weird.
No man in his right mind would just leave his girlfriend in a desert, and drive off in HER CAR, unless he knew she was not in any condition to drive it.
“Gabby Petito case: Florida police say no evidence of criminality in disappearance”
Then where is she and why has boy friend clammed up after showing up without her especially after Utah police were called about their domestic disturbance?
with out the body you just have a missing person
- Tony Soprano
If you correct an earlier statement on a minor mistake the DA will depict you as a pathological liar.
Brained was home for TEN FREAKING DAYS cleaning the van, talkin' to Daddy, talkin' to Daddy's attorney ... meanwhile Gabby's family -- who had been $upplying them with the cash to aimlessly drive around the Intermountain West -- waited in vain for Gabby to re-establish contact!
Just arrest this doofus and sweat him. This isn't Brained surgery...
THIS. But the question exists, was there foul play, before his foul play?
It’s distressing to see so many fools who believe that if you are innocent you don’t need a lawyer. If you’re innocent you need a lawyer even more.
"Jackie Brown" so much a true "film" experience (Pam Grier!, Robert Forster!) moreso than both the later trope-laden "Django Unchained" and "The Hateful Eight".
In "Jackie Brown", Tarantino had a backstory for Melanie Ralston but couldn't get it into the final cut -- needless to say she was a (slothful) criminal and attracted to other criminals.
That said, even if this invest reveals this doofus was life-imitating-art a la Mickey Knox in NBK (which is not "art" but a snuff film), there is no way this girl deserved it or caused it. Because if a rational, normal person doesn't want to go on a 'year-off' journey with an OCD girlfriend, they simply don't go.
There is/was a show on Netflix about people that were convicted for crimes that they probably didn’t do. IIRC some of them ended with you thinking they might have done it, but others you left thinking there was no way they did it (no evidence - just their guilty plea).
Usually younger guys.
“I didn’t do it. I just want to go home!”
“Well Billy, as soon as we can get to the bottom of this I’ll call your dad and he can come pick you up.”
14 hours later of being awake, questioned, etc.
“Okay - I did it. Just let me go home.” (Of course they don’t get to go home then.)
One show ended like that for the one kid and he went to prison for murder. His older buddy that was with him, and is probably the one that killed the girl, he stayed quiet and no evidence to convict him.
If that was my Daughter, the Police wouldn’t need to talk to the guy.
He would tell me everything he knows.
That’s double trouble then, if they both had those problems.
Okay, that settles it. We can all go home now.
Something weird is going on. I do know transporting anything stolen across state lines is a federal felony or used to be, since the van belonged to the girl wonder why they haven’t picked him up for that. Wouldn’t stick but it would dampen his funny business..
These "shows" and all of the f'd up true-crime "shows" on Discovery are purposefully meant to nullify jury pools nation-wide.
"Cops" was #BTB and portrayed scumbags as scumbags, but not a single show in 32 years since then has specifically depicted criminals in the act, unless you count "America's Dumbass Videos Stupidest Criminals" which are mostly archive video and never revealed the disposition of the criminal case against the perps like "Cops" used to do.
You want a wedge issue to drive between Leftist skels, revive "Cops" exactly how it used to be, and engage red state metros like KC, Jacksonville, Ft. Worth, the Nash, etc., so conservatives won't write it off as NIMBY.
There is a pot of gold waiting for someone who revives "Cops" in its professional, deliberative debut-season manner, where the LEO narrated the events of a serious criminal invest and outlined what they hoped to accomplish by the bust -- long before it devolved into a PI/DUI/possession/warrant confessional soap opera.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.