Getting back to Ruby Ridge; I guess gunning down a woman holding a baby is just doing his job. The agent was not charged over that; shoots the family dog and kid etc all over the possibility the guy was allegedly wanting to sell a sawed off shotgun. That family wiped out by your government in action.
> Getting back to Ruby Ridge; I guess gunning down a woman holding a baby is just doing his job. <
Of course not. But the agent involved there can at least make that claim (as flimsy and as disgusting as that claim might be). The agent in this case cannot even make that claim.
Yet he is still immune from lawsuits.