Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai

I don’t get your point. If you are trying to destroy a ship without a nuclear weapon, you need an accurate weapon. Remember this will be coming in facing an array of countermeasures, and close-in weapon systems. The munitions are too expensive they to volley-fire, you have to have a relatively high probability of kill. It’s likely the target will observe the separation of the weapon from the attack aircraft and have a hot reception waiting. This kind of weapon probably costs more per copy than most “warships” in the Iranian “navy”.

Any adversary who cannot counter-measure this system is not worth using it on. Just sink their entire navy with submarines.


11 posted on 09/28/2021 3:59:53 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Diana Moon Glampers for Secretary of Education! )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Lonesome in Massachussets

The true breakthrough would be being able to make them cheaply in large quantities, where you COULD volley fire a swarm of the against a carrier.

And if China sells a few hundred of them to Iran for cheap, and Iran launches a swarm attack and sinks a carrier group, will we launch an attack against China for supplying the missiles?

Always assume that China will operate through deniable proxies.


12 posted on 09/28/2021 4:09:46 AM PDT by SauronOfMordor (A Leftist can't enjoy life unless they are controlling, hurting, or destroying others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson