Posted on 11/09/2021 6:09:57 AM PST by ransomnote
Respected medical journal the British Medical Journal (BMJ) has reported on alleged data integrity issues with clinical trials that were carried out for Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
The report was based on information sent from a whistleblower that was backed up by others who worked on the trial. The journal wrote that “…the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial.”
Additionally, a former regional director for Ventavia Research Group, Brook Jackson, provided company documents, audio recordings, emails and photos supporting her claims to the BMJ. Ventavia is a company that was contracted by the pharmaceutical firm to help with the decisive trial.
According to Jackson, staff at Ventavia were overwhelmed by the volume of issues they found. She said that she repeatedly voiced her concerns to superiors about problems such as patient safety, data integrity and poor lab management.
To add to this, Jackson also reported her concerns to the FDA. Later the same day, she was fired on the grounds that she was “not a good fit.” She said it was the first time she had been fired during her 20-year research career.
Among the information provided to the BMJ by Jackson was a recording of a late September meeting in which she met with two directors of Ventavia to discuss a possible FDA inspection. One executive said to Jackson: “We’re going to get some kind of letter of information at least, when the FDA gets here … I know it.”
A senior executive can also be heard in the recording explaining that the company could not quantify the number and types of errors that were being identified: “In my mind, it’s something new every day,” the individual said. “We know that it’s significant.”
Another employee confirmed that the company was expecting to be subjected to a federal audit of its trial for the Pfizer jab, but one never materialised. From 2000 to 2005, the FDA only inspected 1 percent of clinical trial sites; in 2020, the agency only carried out 50 onsite visits overall.
The BMJ saw an email that was sent to Ventavia by a research organisation that also partnered with Pfizer for the trial. ICON. The email suggests that ICON was unhappy with Ventavia’s failure to keep up with data entry queries. The organisation reminded Ventavia that they expected all queries to be addressed within 24 hours; more than 100 had remained outstanding at that point for more than three days. Among them included cases in which test subjects reported severe adverse reactions.
In Jackson’s complaint to the FDA, she listed a dozen problems that she personally witnessed. Some of the entries included “mislabeled laboratory specimens,” “participants being placed in a hallway after injection and not being monitored by clinical staff,” “vaccines not being stored at proper temperatures,” “protocol deviations not being reported” and “a lack of timely follow-up of patients who experienced adverse events” – along with staff who reported these problems being targeted by Ventavia.
Jackson’s account does not stand alone, however, as other former employees of the company have supported her account, many of whom have since left the company or been fired. Jackson said that an executive who was at the September meeting has since offered her an apology and confirmed that everything she complained about was “spot on.”
The BMJ confirmed several aspects of Jackson’s complaint with two former employees. One revealed that she had worked on more than four dozen clinical trials in her career and had never experienced a work environment like that of the Pfizer trial.
She also said that some of the problems identified by Jackson continued after she left the company. Such as a lack of employees meant that not all trial participants who reported Covid-19 symptoms were swapped for injections.
That employee said she was surprised by the things that were allowed and expected during the trial and added that she doesn’t believe it generated “good clean data.”
Just one of these issues identified by these employees – such as failing to follow up on adverse reactions – should have meant that the vaccine study would have been tossed out. Yet the FDA granted the vaccine full approval.
The article below was great in providing key information the MSM doesn't discuss, including the reputations of the Covid 'vaccine' manufactuerers. Here's an excerpt and I'll put the article link at the bottom:
"#2: THE CHECKERED PAST OF THE VACCINE COMPANIES
The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are/have either:
Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).
Are both (Johnson & Johnson).
Moderna had been trying to "Modernize our RNA" (thus the company name)--for years, but had never successfully brought ANY product to market--how nice for them to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.
In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death--see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and opioids as a few examples.
If drug companies willfully choose to put harmful products in the market, when they can be sued, why would we trust any product where they have NO liability?
In case it hasn't sunk in, let me reiterate...3 of the 4 covid vaccine makers have been sued for products they brought to market even though they knew injuries and deaths would result.
Johnson & Johnson has lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2019 (For what it's worth, J&J's vaccine also contains tissues from aborted fetal cells, perhaps a topic for another discussion)
Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history. They have lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. You can check out their rap sheet here. Maybe that's why they are demanding that countries where they don't have liability protection put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits.
Astra Zeneca has similarly lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. Here's one. Here's another...you get the point. And in case you missed it, the company had their covid vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots, and they completely botched their meeting with the FDA with numbers from their study that didn't match.
Oh, and apparently J&J (whose vaccine is approved for "Emergency Use" in the US) and Astrazenca (whose vaccine is not approved for "Emergency Use" in the US), had a little mix up in their ingredients...in 15 million doses. Oops.
Let me reiterate this point:
Given the free pass from liability, and the checkered past of these companies, why would we assume that all their vaccines are safe and made completely above board?
Where else in life would we trust someone with that kind of reputation?
To me that makes as much sense as expecting a remorseless, abusive, unfaithful lover to become a different person because a judge said deep down they are a good person.
No. I don't trust them.
No liability. No trust." ~Christian Elliot
PING
Gee, I remember what happened when Volkswagen lied to the U.S. Government about what it had done to dodge emission standards for its 2.0 liter diesel engines - I had one. They were forced to buy them all back.
So, what about Pfizer?
Impeach 46.
In a sane world, this, in and of itself, would be enough to shut ALL this BS down for good.
Pfizer Falsified Covid-19 Vaccine Data in Clinical Trials?.............Gee, I wonder why?????????????...........$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$....................................
Hi Ransom
Great post and I appreciate your effort here.
Best regards,
HN
Well guess they were right in that somebody with integrity was not at all a good fit.
Nor can Pfizer "buy back" coerced injections.
This is now criminal territory, in fact, if the circumstantial stories bear out, a big a** RICO case waiting for prosecution.
My point exactly. There must be a penalty. VW paid a price commensurate with what it did. The penalty must fit the crime. With Pfizer and all its enablers, bribe takers, and profiteers of other people’s harm, the penalty should be different. But it must be dealt out to them.
Again, Impeach 46 and the donkey he rode in on. Then move on to deal with those who foisted this on the American people as accessories to the crime, whether before or after the fact.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.