Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeMind
Do you not read studies from the National Center for Biotechnology? They are often eye opening…

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/#B79
13 posted on 12/08/2021 8:58:57 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: Jan_Sobieski
There is absolutely no difference between 5G, 4G, and 3G frequencies for most carriers. 5G, for those original wavelengths, is simply more efficient. T-Mobile and Sprint's entire 5G is overwriting their 4G frequencies. The antenna power is also the same.

AT&T and Verizon have additional frequency space above 3.5Ghz that also makes up their 5G. These higher frequencies are “new,” but some were previously used to some extent. The antennas in small forma may only use 40 watts. On big towers, for all the spread-spectrum antennas on the mast, they are regulated to 1,000 watts, or a bit over half of the power of your clothes iron. This is close to what 4G works at, maximum.

1,000 watts. You get far more damage from cell phones you or your neighbors use.

21 posted on 12/08/2021 9:07:25 PM PST by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Jan_Sobieski; ConservativeMind

From the paper that you are citing:

“A potential criticism of this paper is that adverse bioeffects from nonthermal exposures are not yet universally accepted in science. Moreover, they are not yet considered in establishing public health policy in many nations.”

“Another weakness of this paper is that some of the bioeffects from WCR exposure are inconsistently reported in the literature.”

“Another shortcoming of this paper is that we do not have access to experimental data on 5G exposures. In fact, little is known about population exposure from real-world WCR, which includes exposure to WCR infrastructure and the plethora of WCR emitting devices.”

“Finally, there is an inherent complexity to WCR that makes it very difficult to fully characterize wireless signals in the real world that may be associated with adverse bioeffects.”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8580522/#B79


44 posted on 12/15/2021 2:21:38 PM PST by Pelham (Q is short for quack )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson