Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finland orders 64 Lockheed F-35 fighter jets for $9.4 bln
rueters ^ | December 10, 2021 | Essi Lehto and Mike Stone

Posted on 12/10/2021 10:23:55 PM PST by BenLurkin

The procurement from Lockheed, including weapons as well as service and maintenance until 2030, is estimated to cost 8.378 billion euros ($9.44 billion), the government said.

The construction of hangars and other equipment will add a further 777 million euros, and 824 million euros will be reserved for the final optimised weapons package and to control future contract amendments, it added.

Finland is the 14th nation to opt for the F-35. It will begin phasing in the F-35 from 2027 onwards, said Airforce Commander Pasi Jokinen.

Boeing said it still sees significant international interest in its F/A-18 Block III Super Hornet and EA-18G Growler.

(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: aviation; europe; f35; finland; lockheed

1 posted on 12/10/2021 10:23:55 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I guess these are the standard Air Force model. I think they make 3, that one, the tailhook Navy, and the VTOL Marine. I thought they were still having problems with the VTOL.


2 posted on 12/11/2021 3:45:02 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Are they setting up their own Operation Barbarossa? Lol


3 posted on 12/11/2021 3:53:18 AM PST by BiglyCommentary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

What I’ve read so far about the F-35B variant is that its working and has already been delivered to a few nations, like England ect.

The British Navy just lost one recently during training for their new Carrier. I think the story there was negligence, not because of the F-35’s STOL


4 posted on 12/11/2021 4:01:49 AM PST by Bayard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bayard

Congrats miltary industrial complex .


5 posted on 12/11/2021 4:16:09 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

FYI, the AF version has a tailhook.


6 posted on 12/11/2021 4:52:08 AM PST by ops33 (SMSgt, USAF, Retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ops33

the F-35A tail hook is not the same as the tail hook on the F-35C nor does it have the the same landing gear. The A model hook is for emergency landing with the AF emergency landing kit. (think short landing area on a road/highway or damaged runway.) I would assume you know that.


7 posted on 12/11/2021 6:16:55 AM PST by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ops33

I did not know that. Is it for an emergency landing on a carrier?


8 posted on 12/11/2021 6:39:51 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Trinity5

What would the hook do on a highway or damaged runway?


9 posted on 12/11/2021 6:42:10 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

“What would the hook do on a highway or damaged runway?”

They set up an arresting cable.


10 posted on 12/11/2021 7:26:07 AM PST by dljordan (Slouching towards Woketopia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ops33
FYI, the AF version has a tailhook.

Many AF aircraft have tailhooks to catch emergency arrestor cables that are installed at both military and civilian runways.

https://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/media/Advisory_Circular/150_5220_9a.pdf

11 posted on 12/11/2021 7:42:00 AM PST by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: T.B. Yoits
That is very interesting.

I did not know that, and I was a Jr. member of the Civil Air Patrol.

12 posted on 12/11/2021 8:57:58 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hmmm...
Does that mean they will have more F-35s than the U.S. AF?


13 posted on 12/11/2021 11:53:37 AM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another Sam Adams now that we desperately need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

Normal operations with fighter aircraft. Used to stop fighters landing with an emergency or battle damage. Where the naval barrier cables stop an aircraft in a few feet, AF barriers will stop an aircraft in about 500-750 feet. They are usually configured with two per runway and are bi-directional, can be engaged going either way on a runway. A landing emergency fighter will normally engage the cable at the approach end with the cable at the departure end available if he misses the first cable. A fighter taking off and having a problem on his takeoff roll can abort the takeoff and engage the cable at the departure end. It’s really common, I must have seen thousands of barrier engagements in my career.


14 posted on 12/12/2021 4:59:07 AM PST by ops33 (SMSgt, USAF, Retired)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ops33

Thanks, that was interesting. I’m from Longview, TX, and our airport was the first civilian one to have a 10,000 ft. runway in the state. I heard it was an emergency landing place for the military between the DFW area and Barksdale in Shreveport.


15 posted on 12/12/2021 5:17:47 AM PST by MikeSteelBe (The South will be in the right in the next war of Northern aggression.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: MikeSteelBe

The Air Force has an emergency field landing kit that is used for these situations. It has a cable system that runs across the road or damaged runway and uses the same principal as what the Navy uses. But the jet isn’t designed to do this repeatedly.


16 posted on 12/13/2021 5:06:04 AM PST by Trinity5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson