So?
(nice irrelevant slam)
#IsThatAllYouGot
Is Malone still claiming that he’s “the inventor of mRNA technology”?
His peers don’t say that. They mainly credit the Hungarian woman doctor Kariko and her lab partner Weissman. Their opinion of Malone is that he’s just one of many who contributed.
Is Malone still claiming that he’s “the inventor of mRNA technology”?
His peers don’t say that. They mainly credit the Hungarian woman doctor Kariko and her lab partner Weissman. Their opinion of Malone is that he’s just one of many who contributed.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
His peers are sellouts who turned on him and ‘rewrote’ history to fit the narrative. You won’t see Kariko taking the abuse for confronting the medical establishment and telling the truth as Malone has done.
Malone is the inventor of mRNA technology. Those others you named are the ones who used it to develop vaccines, which he doesn’t agree with. Consider his position equivalent to the inventor of the PCR tests not believing they should have ever be used to determine viral infection, as has been done, which has led to all the questionable results.
So?
(nice irrelevant slam)
#IsThatAllYouGot
“Is Malone still claiming that he’s “the inventor of mRNA technology”?
His peers don’t say that.”
You are kidding, aren’t you. Do you believe his peers when they say the vaccines are safe?
Dr. Malone’s name is one of the names on the patent.
Is Malone still claiming that he’s “the inventor of mRNA technology”?
His peers don’t say that. They mainly credit the Hungarian woman doctor Kariko and her lab partner Weissman. Their opinion of Malone is that he’s just one of many who contributed.
Off topic distract much?
Here’s the video info, for which brave Dr Malone was kicked off of Twitter for tweeting..why not share your snark, er, comments, on this?
Pfizer 6 month data which shows that Pfizer’s COVID-19 inoculations cause more illness than they prevent.
Their (Canadian Covid Alliance) 51 page pdf of their presentation, here:
As far as your snark distraction question goes....this is from Dr Malone’s own website...
...I am an internationally recognized scientist/physician and the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. I hold numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines: including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies....
Maybe you should take a look at his site, as well, before posting your drive by thread smear posts...
And, regarding his peers....you mean bought off Faucists?
I get it.... Attack the messenger when you cannot dispute the facts in the video.
Do you have anything intelligent to say?
This is Jill Malone, Robert’s wife writing is this history. We have been married 42 years and I was intricately involved in science at the time. Furthermore, we have kept all of the records of these events. These include lab books, patent disclosures, patent applications, correspondence, drafts of papers, data, etc. of that period. This history is based on my own recollections, as well as Robert’s and it verified by the written documentation, which can be viewed on the links below.
Dr. Malone is the inventor of mRNA vaccines (and DNA vaccines). He also discovered lipid mediated and naked RNA transfection technologies.
It all started when he was at the Salk Institute in 1987 and 1988. There, he pioneered in-vitro RNA transfection and also in-vivo RNA transfection (in frog embryos, as well as mice).
This resulted in his seminal paper: Cationic liposome-mediated RNA transfection RW Malone, PL Felgner, IM Verma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 86 (16), 6077-6081
His filed patent and disclosures from the Salk included in-vivo RNA transfection, mRNA as a drug, mRNA production, transient gene therapy and also methods for mRNA stabilization. These are available for review and can be found in the link below this statement.
When he left the Salk Institute, he moved his research over to Vical in 1988. He brought over mRNA, constructs, reagents that were developed at the Salk institute by Dr. Malone. The first in-vivo mammalian rat experiments were designed by Dr. Malone in January, 1989: this included dosing amounts for the in-vivo experiments. As he had brought his constructs, plasmids, reagents from the Salk Institute, he was easily able to ramp up his research program at Vical - where he was the only employee actually working on this technology at the time. The first in-vivo mouse experiments were performed in February, 1989 when mRNA and DNA was sent to Dr. Jon Wolff via Fedex. Dr.Wolff and his technicians at the University of Wisconsin injected mice and rats. The initial patent disclosures for RNA and DNA vaccination were written by Dr. Malone in 1988-1989. Dr. Malone was also an inventor of DNA vaccines in 1988 and 1989. He wrote the patent disclosures (again found in the the link below) and helped design the initial experiments, which were carried out by Dr. Gary Rhodes - in consultation with Dr. Malone.
THE INITIAL mRNA VACCINE EXPERIMENT EVER PERFORMED WAS FIRST CARRIED OUT IN 1989 AND IS WRITTEN UP IN THE ORIGINAL PATENTS. THERE ARE IMAGES OF THESE EXPERIMENTS FROM THE PATENTS FOUND AT THE BOTTOM OF THIS PAGE.
This body of work resulted in nine patents and numerous publications, yielding about 7000 citations for this work. The paper was the first showing data for DNA and RNA side by side for in-vivo (the first paper for in-vivo DNA):
Direct gene transfer into mouse muscle in vivo. Wolff JA, Malone RW, et al. Science. 1990;247(4949 Pt 1):1465-8. Cited in 4,750 articles, is the result of that work.
In 1989, research was performed that gave rise to the groundbreaking patents on mRNA vaccination, all with a priority date of March 21, 1989. This is the same priority date as the Salk Patent application, showing that the two institutions were working together. These patents are the first published research on mRNA vaccination. The titles and links to the patents are listed in the documents below. These patents have proof of principle experiments on mRNA vaccines - that clearly document that the invention worked and that these are the first experiments showing this.
Vical told Robert that they would license the Salk Technology (see Vical meeting minutes in the linked document page). Instead, they hired Robert’s thesis advisor from the Salk and soon after, the Salk dropped the patent and Vical never pursued a license from the Salk. Due to an employee contract with Vical, this stopped Robert from working in the field commercially for a decade. Vical claimed all the Salk research happened at Vical and sent a cease and desist letter.
Dr. Malone carried on his research into mRNA and DNA vaccination during the 1990s, culminating in a mucosal patent that was issued in 2000 and had a priority date of 1996. He also helped revolutionize the field of cationic liposomes for the use in RNA and DNA vaccinations. This work was so far ahead of its time, that only now is the world turning to mucosal mRNA vaccination as a method of immunization. For a listing of some of his work, see the publications on the links at the end of this page.
Scientifically trained at UC Davis, UC San Diego, and at the Salk Institute Molecular Biology and Virology laboratories, Dr. Malone received his medical training at Northwestern University (MD) and Harvard University Medical School (Clinical Research Post Graduate) , and in Pathology at UC Davis, He has almost 100 peer-reviewed publications, and has been an invited speaker at about 50 conferences.
For the full backstory on the discovery of mRNA vaccination, as written by Dr. Malone’s partner and wife, please download the PDF located in the section below:
For the full backstory on the discovery of mRNA vaccination, as written by Dr. Malone’s partner and wife, please download the PDF below:
mRNA Vaccine and RNA Transfection/Delivery Papers and Patents directly derived from Robert W Malone’s research
https://www.rwmalonemd.com/general-4
I just watched the video. Is this an attempt at a thread hijack, since it says nothing about the veracity of the video in question?
-PJ